sje4182 said:Not sure whether this is de correct thread to post this but I was doing some casual shooting at home with my 5N and I realise dat de auto ISO is more conservative than my previous C3, meaning, under de same shooting conditions it selects 3200 instead of 1600. I would prefer it to be less conservative![]()
Ouverture said:Thats becos the upper limit of ISO for C3 is 1600 while 5N goes max to 3200 at auto iso mode.
Ouverture said:Thats becos the upper limit of ISO for C3 is 1600 while 5N goes max to 3200 at auto iso mode.
sje4182 said:Erm I just re-read ur post and realised wat u trying to say. De C3 could not go any higher than 1600 whereas de N5 can. But still, since I could manage good photos at 1600 I would prefer de N5 to be less conservative. Maybe Sony should introduce a new setup option which is to adjust ISO conservativeness.
it sounds like the 5n is all that, and the pictures speak for themselves. but in comparison to the nex5. how much better is it better? im especially concerned abt the IQ with the 16mm pancake as that is the lens i forsee myself attaching almost permanently to the camera
miss my panasonic 25mm on the m43.
Ghostfit said:With the 16mm ...definately better, 5N has lens distortion correction built in, 5 does not ...or rather/maybe not yet until the next FW update.
wong_se said:Zeiss 24mm f1.8 is coming your way.
could Nex5N work with 3rd party battery ? plan to get 2X 3rd party rather than getting the original.
ya.. if you interested to get some, PM me... i bought quite a few for standby.. hehecould Nex5N work with 3rd party battery ? plan to get 2X 3rd party rather than getting the original.
De one rasdeep is selling can be used on 5N. I using now.
as for video is mp4 better with more supporting software than avchd full res?