Tang Shooters LII: TCSS Thread...


Status
Not open for further replies.
Wahh... from the Canon Camera Guru.. (Wahaaa..) you better recognised it...

I have tried the ISO12500... lucky dun have the dark spots from hell... heng ahh.. why he so lucky one??

i tink it only appears in some cameras
the suay ones:bsmilie:
 

Chuck .. I am adding him to my fave.. he is so rude that he is good.. enjoy his swearing of Nikon and Canon alike...



Haa... yeah. If not too tense...

ya he's very interesting:bsmilie:
 

haha just look at this post
damn entertaining:bsmilie:
And here I was being afraid of the D3x and worrying about the pricing of our 1D series. My God. This morning when I saw the Nikon press release, my jaw hit the floor from amazement first. For a few minutes, I wasn’t sure what I was experiencing. But then it sank in and I started laughing out loud slamming my desk with my hands. Everyone came running to my office to ask what was wrong. People thought I was finally losing my mind after all the problems I was facing at Canon. They were about to dial 911 when I turned around my monitor and showed them the price of the D3x.

My God. I still can’t believe this. I thought we were ****ed here at Canon having Maeda as our boss, but whoever took that decision at Nikon to price the D3x at $8000 has got to be many times worse compared to Maeda! Jesus Christ! How clueless do you have to be to price the D3x at $8000 at this point in time? Seriously? And don’t get me wrong, we are partying here at Canon because of this, but even as a competitor I have to admit that’s just insane. Our 1Ds Mark III now costs around $6700, and even that is still way overpriced, so howcome Nikon priced the D3x at $8000? I don’t get it. Is the D3x that much better compared to the 1Ds Mark III? I DON’T THINK SO?!!

Hey Nikon, you stupid morons, if you are targeting the medium format crowd with the D3x and that price, I’ve got a newsflash for ya: We already have a better and cheaper alternative, it’s called the 1Ds Mark III! We even have a 5D Mark II that comes pretty close and for sure beats the D3x when it comes to image quality. How the hell do you expect to sell a D3x at $8000? But hey don’t get me wrong, feel absolutely free to give it a try. Just so you know, your users are already buying our 5D2.

We’re now also going to ramp up production of the 1Ds Mark III again. The D3x can’t stand a chance. Right now at this very moment, life is good.
 

damn.. Fake Chuck.... way to go... screwed his own boss after screwing Nikon... well we need the critiques around ...
 

Tis ish funnie :bsmilie:

LOL!!!!!

3086378886_35734f501c_o.gif

haha just look at this post
damn entertaining:bsmilie:

we ish poor people, out of our budget range lol so not to worry
 

Falc's test on 5DmkII

The original jpeg from 5DmkII : http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3180/3085632473_4fdaa02511_o.jpg
Please note image is 15MB...

Took a sample with EOS 5DmkII, EF17-40 at F8, ISO400. The setup is with interest of checking out wide on a FF.. and F8 chose becos I have never been convinced of 17-40 to give me sharp performances. Using spot metering on the bus terminal number (No.4 against the green back).. and expecting the sky to be blown at ISO400... to check some fringing (or mysterious black spot claimed by Fake Chuck)..

3085632473_a95b761592_b.jpg

The image...

3086492638_283efe8511_o.jpg

At 100% crop...
 

buttie ish wana change to D3x?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top