Is it worth to pay quite alot more for the VC version?
how does this "Vibration Compensation" helps?
thanks~@
how does this "Vibration Compensation" helps?
thanks~@
I'd not be too quick to discount the VC or IS in low range lens cos Canon must know something to put IS into their EF-S17-55mm F/2.8 IS lens. VC/IS/VR/ is designed not only meant to minimise the handshake in high zoom range but also to cater for extremely low SS usually due to dim lighting conditions, to be able to shoot handheld as low as 1/1.3sec & still get a reasonable shot without resorting to very high ISO.Is it worth to pay quite alot more for the VC version?
how does this "Vibration Compensation" helps?
thanks~@
If i'm not wrong the non VC would cost abt 600+ tops. ^^ tat's alot for a VC
I've tried the tamron VC 17-50mm, its performance is much better compared to my old non vc tamron. Tamron VC has faster focusing, the motor sound smoother with less noise. The VC will defiantly help on occasion when you need to shot at slow shuttle. All I can say is you get what you pay for, buy if you can afford it. I'll defiantly buy it for my next upgrade.