How would you know they're doing fine? Did you ever interview any indigenous peoples? Did you ever see the suffering from malnutrition, disease, famine, etc? The point is that, given a choice, I think it's highly unlikely anyone will want to remain in the jungle.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/10/daniel-everett-amazon, or the Akha tribe, both examples, they rather the outsiders leave them alone
Nobody says white men came to help anybody. As I said, it's all about self-interest.
Na'vi is fiction. Fiction only tells what the author wants to say.
Reality is a lot different. Ever heard of the tribal massacres in Africa? One tribe killing another? That's reality-- it's all about self-interest.
Yes, I understand your point about self-interest. But still, isn't it better to champion a all-loving, compassionate spirit among mankind? Yes, one tribe killing another, war is inevitable, but do we wage war on them just because they are fighting among themselves?
I think you need to understand American better. They can't even say prayers in school now.
And is that a bad thing? If prayers are allowed in school, how about Muslim prayers, or Buddhist meditations, or Scientology auditing, or Pastafarian's noodly beliefs? I mean, there's too many religious beliefs in this world of different people, so isn't it more fair to get rid of it. If I remember reading before previously, the reason why prayers in school was disallowed, was because children of the other religions, and the non-religious, felt ostracized by the mainstream Christian students.
I definitely do not understand America in depth and yes, I find they're an overtly religious country leaning on the side of bigotry. The war on terror is complicated, dragging way before the 9/11, and it would be unwise of me to comment further, except to say yet again, it's extremism on both sides.