I went nikon and came back. I went canon and came back. Both times thinking how extensive their lenses were and i would have lots of fun playing with them.
I was wrong, Twice! Still came back sony.
Whether for IQ or for built quality, they were not really as good as many claimed.
Lenses were also not as cheap as many claimed and in fact are far more expensive if you compare the good grades one. People always tend to compare CZ pricing with c/n ones which is not fair. When you look deep enough, there are still lots of limitations at those camps lens lineup and those so called cheap ones are consumer grade lenses.
If you add in usm, vr, is, etc, they are more expensive and may not have better optical quality either.
My 2cents as a ex canon and nikon user.
I was wrong, Twice! Still came back sony.
Whether for IQ or for built quality, they were not really as good as many claimed.
Lenses were also not as cheap as many claimed and in fact are far more expensive if you compare the good grades one. People always tend to compare CZ pricing with c/n ones which is not fair. When you look deep enough, there are still lots of limitations at those camps lens lineup and those so called cheap ones are consumer grade lenses.
If you add in usm, vr, is, etc, they are more expensive and may not have better optical quality either.
My 2cents as a ex canon and nikon user.