Well, having a good/bad camera is like having an expensive daler rowney brush or a cheap popartz brush... It's how you use it. Even though I don't agree with the review, it's the reviewer's own opinions. The reviewer does prefer some features and performances and he measures stuff against benchmarks he sets, and it varies according to each individual.
The most important thing is to get it to integrate and work properly in your work flow.
A camera can be well reviewed, but it's useless and unwise to buy it just because of some words and impressions of a writer - and it winds up not working well with you. So what's the use of the camera if that's the case? Do you trust the words of a stranger who probably writes more than he shoots, or do you trust your own hands and intuition?
Many people concentrate on the cameras and forget about the photography.