albertri
Senior Member
Bought a33 at Cathay this afternoon. So far so good.
How much Cathay charges you bro? paid cash or cc?
I'm waiting for A55 very tempted
Bought a33 at Cathay this afternoon. So far so good.
How much Cathay charges you bro? paid cash or cc?
I'm waiting for A55 very tempted
The DSLT technology certainly looks exciting but can any bro enlighten me on what is the difference between the Sony DSLTs and the micro 4/3 systems? I'm not referring to the sensors and mounts.
When I compare both systems, they are all just EVIL systems. What is the advantage of having an translucent mirror in DSLTs? Micro 4/3s (or even the NEX) don't have such a mirror and they seem to work in the same fashion?
Anyone?
*Confused*![]()
The DSLT technology certainly looks exciting but can any bro enlighten me on what is the difference between the Sony DSLTs and the micro 4/3 systems? I'm not referring to the sensors and mounts.
When I compare both systems, they are all just EVIL systems. What is the advantage of having an translucent mirror in DSLTs? Micro 4/3s (or even the NEX) don't have such a mirror and they seem to work in the same fashion?
Anyone?
*Confused*![]()
Actually slt has a mirror it's just that the mirror in slt are translucent so it doesn't need to swing up when we press the shuttle to allow light to hit the sensors.
Can I say the non swinging mirror is a contributing factor to the higher FPS?
Hi, I think so. But to increase 6fps to 10 fps, u need to use the "Continous Advance Priority
AE" which gives a continous flow of light from the lens to the image sensor, locking the aperture
all the time to produce 10fps as the imaging sensor has 70% light.
I think the lesser light of 70% has nothing to do with aperture locking for 10fps.
It locks the aperture so as to reduce the time needed to stop down the lens to the required aperture setting...so less time needed as the sensor can fire away continuously while PDAF is always in focus.
So it becomes the only bottleneck is shutter and how fast the processor can capture and process the images.
The main advantage of SLT over Nex/M4/3 is enable the use of phase detect af which is faster than contrast detect af.
Hopefully all mirrorless format starts to employ phase detect af sensors built into the main sensor (like what fuji did with f300exr and also canon seems to have patent some design which uses this concept in their upcoming evils), then that will be the time that SLT may not be as useful as of now.
Hi, Agree. No stopping down so as to allow the sensor to work continously without interruption to produce 10fps.
Was reading about the SLT Sony says 70% of the lght goes to the Sensor and 30% of the light goes to the OVF... was thinking how would this affect the image? compare to a normal DSLR?
This is almost the same principle as ND filter....
Would be nice if someone who owns the older Alpha and newer A33/A55 to shoot the same subject same setting same lighting and same lens and f-stop.... see if there's a difference in terms of brighness and saturation.
Was reading about the SLT Sony says 70% of the lght goes to the Sensor and 30% of the light goes to the OVF... was thinking how would this affect the image? compare to a normal DSLR?
This is almost the same principle as ND filter....
Would be nice if someone who owns the older Alpha and newer A33/A55 to shoot the same subject same setting same lighting and same lens and f-stop.... see if there's a difference in terms of brighness and saturation.
Already discussed to death... It's only 0.5 stops, not significant.