But then TS said when using the 50/1.8D, the spot is not visible. Unless the larger aperture allows enough light in to be 'blinding', thus cannot see the spot
Otherwise I'm confused![]()
It's less obvious on certain lenses I think... nearly disappears on my f1.4 primes.
It can be easily seen when you shine a light into the camera body at the focusing screen.
chanjyj said:Because your EYE is unable to focus on that "spot" when you are using lenses. Your eye is focusing on the image that appears at the distance the lens is focused for.
To view the "spot" you have to the entire image has to be unfocused so your eye can focus on the spot (which is darned near to your eye actually). Your eye is simply not used to focusing on something 2cm infront of you.
Try using your lenses and pointing them at a white cloud. The whole viewfinder must be covered by the cloud, which is WHITE. Then bring the image OOF. You may see the "spot".
I get what u mean.
But then the TS' point abt the spot appearing when kit lens used, can't be explained away w this.
So I am really confused![]()
dimmer viewfinder due to larger aperture = more contrast between viewing screen and virtual image?
ZerocoolAstra said:hmmmmm :think:
eh, but larger aperture lens will give a brighter image in the VF. Noticeable difference (to me) when I mount 35/1.8G vs 18-105.
aiyoh... headache thinking about this![]()
Brighter image pupils dilate. Spot becomes too dark to be seen.
Sorry but that is factually incorrect. Pupils contract in bright light and dilate in dark surroundings to let more light in. Cheers!
tsk. now that i've become aware of it ... i see it everyday!
it's right smack in the middle of the kit lens, haven't noticed before because of the AF marker set on my center focus point.![]()