photographique
Senior Member
I just want to ask that if the Sigma 10-20mm is ok with the hot spot problem it has, as in it can be avoided?
Is it better than the Tokina 12-24mm??
Thanks!
Is it better than the Tokina 12-24mm??
Thanks!
dunno if anyone else is using the 10-20mm to shoot IR.....
but i experienced hotspot when shooting f8 and smaller.
so usually i shoot ard 5.6 or 6.3 to be safe
I see, so above f/8, it's fine??!!
:think:
im not sure about the tokina..but u can ask the others.
with a 77mm IR filter mounted on the front..i usually zoom in slightly to ard 12mm....
with a tokina...u might be shooting at ard 14mm if u zoom in a little. maybe the tokina users can say something about this. :think:
i do this to prevent vignetting at the corners.
everyone got their own style / workflow....so try out different settings!
I'm using the Tokina 12-24mm, but I experience hot spot even at f/4, so I wanted to ask about the Sigma 10-20mm, and it's listed in the bad lenses for IR...sigh.
So, you were saying when you use ur Sigma 10-20mm at f/8, and above, such as f/5.6, you didn't experience any hot spot???
:think:
oh ...i checked out your D.A site....u got a good eye for building / architecture shots! :thumbsup:
hotspot could be due to long exposures also i believe...so it depends :think:
So if you use a modified camera, then hot spots are not likely to appear since you won't use long exposures?
If so, then does this mean that those lens listed as 'bad lens for IR' may potentially be usable on modified cameras? (eg Tokina 12-24mm f4 was specifically listed as bad)
I remember a guru telling me hot spots are not caused by long exposure but refraction of the lenses. You should be able to avoid it when you stop down but the price is the shallower DOF.