nightpiper said:
i dun know how many agree that interpolation doesn't add anything to the image, i still find it hard to accept that despite the increase in file size & smoothen out pixelation with enlargement prints has not alter the image in anyway. to me, by guessing & filling in the 'blanks' already falls in the cat.
Okay, let's try another tack. When you make an enlargement from a 35mm negative, you are taking a 24mm x 36mm film and enlarging it to say, for ease of comparison, 24" x 36". That means that for every mm of film, you need to find an inch of enlargement. This is done by projecting the image onto a piece of photosensitive paper. The process is not a million miles away from "interpolation".
i define D1x as a different class not just becos of its physical built quality, the electronic parts inside are of a higher quality too. things like dampening vibration & extra reduction of interference (eg, from handphone) will also help in the overall image quality.
Dampening, ok but take that out of the equation for the time being. I stated my test subjects (three ducks, one rhino, and no they weren't shot for a test, they were taken first and foremost as photographs), and in those instances shutter speeds are high enough to not render dampening an issue. In terms of noise, the D100 has less noise than the D1x. In terms of resolution, the D100 should have better resolution than the D1x.
surely nikon won't be selling u a D1x at $7k & D100 at $2.7k
Nikon are also selling a D1h new for more money than a new D2h at the moment. You're talking about a factor of about 2.5 times in price. The price of an F5 and an F80 is about 4 times.
next is the s/w. D1x being unique with their CCD vertical resolution must do some sort of image manipulation to bring it to normal 4020x2638 (pls dun bomb me if the resolution is wrong).
I said it before, I'll say it again. [1] The D1x does not have a normal resolution of 4020x2638. It has a normal resolution of 3008x1960. [2] If you shoot JPEGs, there is absolutely no way you can get a 10mp file. [3] Nikon never really touted the D1x as a 10mp camera, and did not for a long time support (ie give you any way of producing) a 10mp file. [4] It was only after third party software like Qimage and Bibble allowed the conversion that eventually Nikon yielded to providing the means to produce a 10mp file from raw files. The D1x is NOT a 10mp camera by any stretch of the imagination. Never was, never will be.
nikon is definitely not going to use simple & cheap algorithm to do that. the s/w must be of hi-quality, hi-standard.
Incidentally, plenty of debate spawned about whether Qimage produced the better conversions, or if Bibble did, or if Capture did. Certainly Capture did not win by the country mile. When it comes to interpolation algorithms, again there is plenty of debate, but I'd trust a full blown desktop machine running dedicated software like GF or PS to run interpolation algos over a camera which has to juggle 18mb files three times a second.
if u look at reviews, they often compare cameras among their class, price range if u want to put it the other way round.
I agree, and I would not have started this whole palaver if you hadn't made your comments with respect to 6mp cameras in general.
Actually, I would still have done, but I would have used a D100 or 10D as an example instead.
how about experimanting with film scanning, grain reduction, interpolation & sharpening to get a 35mm to 20x30? frankly, i dun have a scanner but rely on the photolabs. pls dun misinterpret this as a challenge to u, just a friendly discussion & experiment. i m very curious to know how a 35mm film blows up to 20x30 after digital enhancement. thx & dun forget that smile.
Erm, and what do you think I was doing with my little test?
How does it blow up? Perfectly fine. Would I rather have my D2h data to work with? Yes. Would I rather have a D1x over that? Marginally. Would I take 645 over that? Yes. And would I rather have 14n data over that? Heck yes. But I never anywhere here said that 135 film doesn't produce decent enlargements.
I did some comparison crops about a year ago with Velvia 100F and D1x shots, will try and find them, but it's 4am and I'm exceedingly tired so it'll have to wait.