Dear Mr Low
I refer to your e-mail of 9 Dec 2004 and 5 Jan 2005.
We note that the e-mail dated 9 Dec 2004 was addressed to the MCYC Feedback
Unit.
We would like to inform you that the police does not provide legal advice
to the public. You may wish to seek legal advice from a lawyer.
As regards the photograph of the Police Officer sleeping in the Police car,
we have been in touch with Mr Lawrence Quek who provided us the information
and feedback. We have expressed our appreciation to him for bringing the
matter to our attention. The Police does not condone such misconduct and
appropriate action will be taken against the Police Officer concerned.
Thank you and best regards
Paul Tan
for Quality Service Manager
Singapore Police Force
----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure why I haven't received any reply on this matter,
furthermore, it has come to my knowledge that recently (this week) mrbrown
of
www.mrbrown.com was apparently told by police or isd to remove pictures
he posted of cops caught napping in a patrol car.
so to add to my list of questions, what about photography of police and
other security personel with and without their knowledge?
I believe one of the key initiatives of the PS21 is a response of some sort
within 3 days, considering that my request was made on 9 Dec, it certainly
taking a long time in coming.
thank you
Christopher Low
----------------------------------------------------------------
There are a couple of discussions going on on law and photography.
if you're interested, the pertinent discussions are here.
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=101732
What is the legal position of photography (for non press photographer)in
the following scenarios?
a) non famous people in the street
b) famous people
c) famous people in an event organised by the building owner
d) famous people in an event organised by a tenant of the building.
e) government buildings (not military, but civil, eg: hdb hub, MAS, the
new
supreme court etc)
f) of the MRT train, of MRT stations, or of people inside the MRT trains
g) of private buildings (from the roadside)
h) are there places where it is illegal to use a photographic tripod?
i) scene of an accident (eg: car crash)
in otherwords, in which situations do you need a model release, in which
situations are you legally NOT allowed to take pictures. in which
situations are you legally allowed to take pictures for private
consumption
(ie: not for general publication)
It would be nice to have the information on the police website as well.
---
Next Issue, the law and nude photography.
a) there are certain statutes against obscenity, but at what point does
art
becomes obscenity. a search of the statutes does not bring out any items
relating to pornography (just obscenity)
b) distribution of such works. what kind of distribution is allowed?
(print/private invitation gallery, public gallery, shopping center )
c) which parts of the body are "forbidden" (is there a criteria for
different sorts of audience, eg: R(A), M18 etc)
d) what if for private consumption?
my definition of course is that if sexual arousal is the sole defining
merit of the work.
http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=104580
of course, this has some relevancy to the steve chia case, if the maid
wasn't under aged, would there have been any charges at all?