Hi,
I have and been using Tamron for more than 4 months. I am happy with it from everything, sharpness from 2.8, close focus, fast AF. But most of all, the convenience with zoom for walk around. It also is a nice portrait lens (but not somewhat very nice bokeh). The cons is: just it is too heavy and the color is not rich and nice. That's why I am thinking to replace it by a 35ltd + cash different.
I currently have DA 18-55 and an M50 1.7. So my question is: Is it really worth it to scarify the zoom to get the nicer color/contrast? Or should there anything else the 35ltd beat the Tamron that I should consider? What is the purpose for 35ltd really.
There is another cheaper option: 40ltd
Cheers
I have and been using Tamron for more than 4 months. I am happy with it from everything, sharpness from 2.8, close focus, fast AF. But most of all, the convenience with zoom for walk around. It also is a nice portrait lens (but not somewhat very nice bokeh). The cons is: just it is too heavy and the color is not rich and nice. That's why I am thinking to replace it by a 35ltd + cash different.
I currently have DA 18-55 and an M50 1.7. So my question is: Is it really worth it to scarify the zoom to get the nicer color/contrast? Or should there anything else the 35ltd beat the Tamron that I should consider? What is the purpose for 35ltd really.
There is another cheaper option: 40ltd
Cheers