Sharing a review of CV 35 1.4 SC vs MC

[lordpain]

I remember when I was starting RF 2 years ago, I was looking between the SC and MC versions of the 35 1.4. The lens was compact and provided a good alternative to the 35 Summilux which was out of my budget. Despite many reviews, I was still confused to what to get. Then I came across this review. Though in Japanese, one can use Google translate, and they have man pictures to show each lens' performance.

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2004/12/03/466.html

 

[raytoei]

Hi lordpain,

i am sure you know this:

SC - Lower contrast, may be less resistant to flare. More classic rendering.
MC - Multi-coated. More modern rendition.

In practical terms, not much difference to my old eyes,
i bought a SC from Chiif a few weeks ago, works
well for my R-D1:

 

[lrrp77]

From Stephen's site:

"Unlike the sharp modern look of the 35/1.2 or 35/2.5, the 35/1.4 is designed to have more of a vintage classic photojournalism look of the 1960's.

Single Coat SC or Multi Coat MC versions. The SC is excellent for color while giving slightly more shadow detail for B/W. The MC version gives the maximum amount of flare prevention while giving slightly higher contrast in B/W but less shadow detail. Close focus .7 meter. Available in black only, M mount only. The 35/1.4 takes the dedicated bayonet on LH-6 lens shade. Small compact size about 1mm shorter than the 40/1.4 and weighing 25g more than the 40/1.4!! Introduced January 2008."

Voigtlander Leica Mount Lenses

 

[Jazz]

I choose SC because has lower contrast than the MC. It will make more free to choose film (hi-contrast film like HP5).

CV 35 1.4 SC on Digital (M8)

 

[zgim80]

I have an MC on the way and but since i like contrast, it should work out for me. Thankfully black cos I'm on a black body!

 

[lordpain]

I believe both MC and SC versions are black.

 

[zgim80]

I believe both MC and SC versions are black.

Hey kai, you be right. The lens is here so now test-rolling =D