That's why...I get a similar look when I do tri-x in hc-110 at 1+64BTW, Rodinal I used was 1:50 dilution

That's why...I get a similar look when I do tri-x in hc-110 at 1+64BTW, Rodinal I used was 1:50 dilution
That's why...I get a similar look when I do tri-x in hc-110 at 1+64![]()
With developers like HC-110 and Rodinal longer baths mean increased contrast and accuance which results in more apparent grain (grain doesn't actually "increase", it just becomes easier to see). This is true even though both are somewhat compensating and has nothing to do with agitation method but the total amount of time in the developer.OpenLens, I don't think that's why. 1:25 and 1:50 are standard dilutions for Rodinal. Rather, that is why Rodinal is known to be one of the economical solutions (but best known for lasting long).
Also, the more diluted Rodinal results in slightly smaller grain, from some consumer experiences. Furthermore, agitation has to decrease as one dilutes Rodinal more, like for 1+100 agitate every other minute or so.
Anyway, that's the Rodinal + Tri-X combi, for those who like grain or need to have grain for certain shots.
Skip it if you're not into grain. Or if you're fine with HC110 achieving the same effect, then great, no need to spend or waste time![]()
Anyway, I am OOT, sorry, this should be in the other section
.
A picture of my son with a Canon 50/1.2 LTM mounted on my R-D1. The picture is rather soft,
A picture of my son with a Canon 50/1.2 LTM mounted on my R-D1. The picture is rather soft, I think.
![]()
v.sweet...![]()
Leica M6, Nokton 40mm f1.4, Ilford HP5 400 pushed 2 stops to 1600.
![]()
XPAN
..
![]()
XPAN
..
new downtown skyline?