Share Some RF Shots 4

[YOL925]

Testing the 1935 Thambar 90 2.2 !

Do a quick B&W conversion just to see how it looks:

(Sincere apology if offended.)

 

[alex36]

Do a quick B&W conversion just to see how it looks:

(Sincere apology if offended.)

No apologies required, it does look better. I guess for a lens that age, it was optimised for BW film. Thanks!

 

[welspain]

 

[neoro]

Lovely Lovely Ektar..

Canon 7 + 0.95 wide wide open

1)

2)

3)

 

[neoro]

 

[howxq]

Here are some of my shots from my first roll:
Solaris 400

Enjoy

 

[nordleadx]

how can u sell this camera with the lens.

 

[julescasablancas]

Here are some of my shots from my first roll:
Solaris 400

where do u get ur solaris from? :think:

 

[neoro]

how can u sell this camera with the lens.

Yeah man,
I miss this combo sometimes

 

[hookonclassic]

Do a quick B&W conversion just to see how it looks:

(Sincere apology if offended.)

This rare & exotic old lens (1935-1939) is specifically designed for soft focus portraiture, non contrasty and nostalgic at time. Works better on black and white.

Thank you for sharing.

 

[hookonclassic]

Lady with an Umbrella...

No turning back...

Tourist sidewalk

Sweat & medal... strive & glory...

M2.. M3.. b&w film

 

[neoro]

A man and his loyal companion..

 

[Royale With Cheese]

A man and his loyal companion..

wa, master:angel:

 

[Royale With Cheese]

M2.. M3.. b&w film

What film is that? very nice tones. Did you tweek?

 

[alex36]

This rare & exotic old lens (1935-1939) is specifically designed for soft focus portraiture, non contrasty and nostalgic at time. Works better on black and white.

Thank you for sharing.

Still getting to know this lens, when stopped down, works like a normal 90mm. This was taken with the RD1. Going to test it with some BW Film soon.

 

[ZoomP]

Still getting to know this lens, when stopped down, works like a normal 90mm. This was taken with the RD1. Going to test it with some BW Film soon.

Bro, maybe it needs a CLA? Go pay old man a visit.

 

[dankwan]

Zeiss Planar ZM50f2 Lucky 200/Kodak Gold 400

 

[alex36]

Bro, maybe it needs a CLA? Go pay old man a visit.

Most likely it's the photographer, not the lens, that is the problem!

 

[neoro]

Guys,

Have a look below, could this be due to

1) Fungus ?
2) Damaged negative
3) Xray exposure?

Neg went through the hand carry xray @ Singapore and Malaysia airports respectively.
Normal self develop method, so far no issues I think , as other rolls came out ok
Lens was a Nokton 50mm F1.1 - ok as well don't think its due to lens as I saw other frames ok.
Some frames has this while some didnt have such a markings on the same roll
Or could this be due to bubbles in the developer ?

 

[welspain]

Or could this be due to bubbles in the developer ?

possible...
but these are watermarks...did you use wetting agent..?