Share Some RF Shots 14


Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's two from Vilnius, Lithuania.
Both taken on Neopan 400 with W-Nikkor 2.8cm 1:3.5 and Nikon SP 2005


No entry for cool cats riding scooters


It was this big, I swear!
 

Last edited:
Do you guys still pp ur filmscans?

Oriscan
6148506485_696f0589ba_z.jpg


PPed
6162077418_65e84fefd1_z.jpg


one reason i went over to film is becos i do not want to PP
 

maybe i'm missing something here. I thought most scanners give a very flat image. so pp is necessary for contrast in particular.
 

hmmm, but my color film shots were ok, no pp needed

6128658515_097d56cb9a_z.jpg

but tats me la
 

Do you guys still pp ur filmscans?

Oriscan
6148506485_696f0589ba_z.jpg


PPed
6162077418_65e84fefd1_z.jpg


one reason i went over to film is becos i do not want to PP

Wow, your pre-PP image looks really flat to me. My Coolscan 5000 does much better than that straight out of the scanner. Some scans don't need any adjustment at all, but some still need the contrast tweaked a little. Never as much as your sample image though.
 

i usually turn off auto-exposure in my epson 600 and i manually do the curves for contrast and brightness myself.
 

Do you guys still pp ur filmscans?

one reason i went over to film is becos i do not want to PP

I agree with you! I don't PP my films because I just want my pictures to be the "naturest" to the film that I am using.
 

It depends on how you use the scanner software. If you use all the defaults, the chances are that the software is doing the PP for you. If you turn off all PP in scanner software, you will get a flat image that will need contrast enhancement and also a bit of sharpening.

I find that I rarely need to change anything in color balance.
 

i too feel the need for the "naturest" look to my film. as naive as it is since even in the wet printing days everything can be adjusted and dodged and burned. but i think LKSC has a point about getting the "flattest" possible scan to allow maximum space for adjustment.

I agree with you! I don't PP my films because I just want my pictures to be the "naturest" to the film that I am using.
 

While this may be partially true for color, for traditional B&W there is no concept of "naturest". The final output depends on so many factors of your choice -- developer, temperature, time, agitation, water hardness, grade of paper etc etc etc. I dont see why doing these tweaks in Lightroom instead of a darkroom is any different.

I agree with you! I don't PP my films because I just want my pictures to be the "naturest" to the film that I am using.
 

Scooter as a transport, canon 50 f1.8
6136330360_a67b1321dc_z.jpg
 

Do you guys still pp ur filmscans?

Oriscan
6148506485_696f0589ba_z.jpg


PPed
6162077418_65e84fefd1_z.jpg


one reason i went over to film is becos i do not want to PP

This picture is probably taken at a dark place. The original picture is probably under-exposed. The scanner software tried to pick up details on the negatives and could not. That is why it tries to make the whole picture whiter. Thus the image looks a little wash out.

If you treat Photography as an ART, then there is nothing wrong in doing post processing on your picture. The final output is more important than how you achieve it. But if you treat photography as a technology tool or science and expect final output to be perfect every time, then get the technical aspect correct at the point of image capture, so that you do not need to do any post processing after scanning.

A well exposed negative require less processing or sometimes no post processing at all. But in real life, we all know that it's not possible to get a well exposed image across the whole frame. Some shadow details are hidden or some highlight are blown out. That's why there's such thing as dodge and burn.

Hope that helps. My suggestion is, try not to get so hung up on scanning software, whether to post process or not. Go out and shoot, enjoy the camera, enjoy the process, B&W development, admire and share the picture you have taken. Don't get so hung up on gears and tools.

It will be a more enjoyable journey this way.
 

Go out and shoot, enjoy the camera, enjoy the process, B&W development, admire and share the picture you have taken. Don't get so hung up on gears and tools.

It will be a more enjoyable journey this way.

Yes.. The best camera + lens + film + scanner + monitor + etc will be useless if you don't have the time to shoot... :)

Less talk.. more shooting!
 

This picture is probably taken at a dark place. The original picture is probably under-exposed. The scanner software tried to pick up details on the negatives and could not. That is why it tries to make the whole picture whiter. Thus the image looks a little wash out.

If you treat Photography as an ART, then there is nothing wrong in doing post processing on your picture. The final output is more important than how you achieve it. But if you treat photography as a technology tool or science and expect final output to be perfect every time, then get the technical aspect correct at the point of image capture, so that you do not need to do any post processing after scanning.

A well exposed negative require less processing or sometimes no post processing at all. But in real life, we all know that it's not possible to get a well exposed image across the whole frame. Some shadow details are hidden or some highlight are blown out. That's why there's such thing as dodge and burn.

Hope that helps. My suggestion is, try not to get so hung up on scanning software, whether to post process or not. Go out and shoot, enjoy the camera, enjoy the process, B&W development, admire and share the picture you have taken. Don't get so hung up on gears and tools.

It will be a more enjoyable journey this way.

Spoken like a true master
 

This picture is probably taken at a dark place. The original picture is probably under-exposed. The scanner software tried to pick up details on the negatives and could not. That is why it tries to make the whole picture whiter. Thus the image looks a little wash out.

If you treat Photography as an ART, then there is nothing wrong in doing post processing on your picture. The final output is more important than how you achieve it. But if you treat photography as a technology tool or science and expect final output to be perfect every time, then get the technical aspect correct at the point of image capture, so that you do not need to do any post processing after scanning.

A well exposed negative require less processing or sometimes no post processing at all. But in real life, we all know that it's not possible to get a well exposed image across the whole frame. Some shadow details are hidden or some highlight are blown out. That's why there's such thing as dodge and burn.

Hope that helps. My suggestion is, try not to get so hung up on scanning software, whether to post process or not. Go out and shoot, enjoy the camera, enjoy the process, B&W development, admire and share the picture you have taken. Don't get so hung up on gears and tools.

It will be a more enjoyable journey this way.

very well say
couldnt agree more.:thumbsup:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top