I started from film then to digital then back to film again and never look back since. There is a lot of potentials for digital as initially I thought. But from the way digital technology progresses it will never be able to deliver what the impressional imagery film gives. The way I see it, advances the digital gives will produce images as more hyper-realistic, something akin to 3D realistic-like. Film gives you grains, whereas digital have noises, just whether is noticeable or not.
Film cameras, especially the vintage ones, usually outlasts its owner. Digital cameras have shorter life-span, and this is what the manufacturer aimed to achieve, so they are manufacture them as consumeable products for the next models. And just look at those DSLRs and the likes currently, they all looks like standard military issues. Everybody carries the same things and those standard military issues lacks feelings. That is why most photos lacks feelings.
In the past I got sucked into this trap where glow, sharpness and bokeh is the ultimate. I was totally wrong. 3D Computer Graphic Imagery (CGI) produces the ultimate glow, sharpness and bokeh I have ever seen in my life. Now I aim for other things which an old vintage cameras are very apt in producing which digital imagery is trying very hard to photoshop and imitate.