SGD $1000/- cash reward
- Thread starter d.a.photo
- Start date
- Status
1) you cannot defame someone in pm. libel must be witnessed by third parties and must harm the reputation of the person being defamed.
2) the jury is out whether you can defame an online nick, especially when the nick is new and the knowledge of your real person to your online persona is not known.
3) speaking the truth isn't defamation. eg: calling someone gay who ACTUALLY is gay isn't libel, and if society also no longer finds being gay a "shameful/slanderous" remark, then it also doesn't apply. (thus calling certain people an enlightened despot doesn't qualify as slander)
4) if you're a lawyer, you should how to subpeona the administrator of this forum for the email address registered to yanyewkay and then subpeona the isp for his contact details.
2) the jury is out whether you can defame an online nick, especially when the nick is new and the knowledge of your real person to your online persona is not known.
3) speaking the truth isn't defamation. eg: calling someone gay who ACTUALLY is gay isn't libel, and if society also no longer finds being gay a "shameful/slanderous" remark, then it also doesn't apply. (thus calling certain people an enlightened despot doesn't qualify as slander)
4) if you're a lawyer, you should how to subpeona the administrator of this forum for the email address registered to yanyewkay and then subpeona the isp for his contact details.
mods....work leh.
On a side note, i recalled that in the past CS had a rule where you were not allowed to publicly name shops or businesses just because you did not like them? has this since been lifted? This is dangerous to the admins since the shops can chose to sue the forum for being responsible for hosting such solicitous comments. Perhaps it is time to install some filterS? DA.PHOTO, i'm really keen on hearing your interpretation of the law. I thought this thread was lost. Or have you taken my advice and left the forum?
On a side note, i recalled that in the past CS had a rule where you were not allowed to publicly name shops or businesses just because you did not like them? has this since been lifted? This is dangerous to the admins since the shops can chose to sue the forum for being responsible for hosting such solicitous comments. Perhaps it is time to install some filterS? DA.PHOTO, i'm really keen on hearing your interpretation of the law. I thought this thread was lost. Or have you taken my advice and left the forum?
i had previously posted our PMs.. but witnin minutes.. someone PMed me to take it down as it is not nice to disclose private messages without the other parties consent. (sounds like it happened with our country leaders)Grub said:
I had never called him any names or slandered hiim.
In abstract, I told him every business is out to make profit and anyone who claims they are selling at cost price are probably running a charity and if he wants to do so I'll gladly buy from him.
I gave him an analogy that a bowl of mee pok costs less than 50cents and he can flame the uncle for selling at such a high price.
Finally, I told him, "Welcome to the real world"
Oh yah.. I also told him not to fire big words around if he isn't all that conversant with law.
Slander? Name calling? :dunno:
bigfatfish
New Member
whoa. so many posts already. hmm 1k sounds like a real sweet deal here man.
but of course, i m really more interested in the drama. where is da lawyer?
but of course, i m really more interested in the drama. where is da lawyer?
haha pls refer to pg 4 bottom few postsjudeseah said:tell u wat, bro,
give me the info,
we split 50-50 the $1000/=.
wat do u say?
yanyewkay said:
glennyong: I tot they just upgraded new hardware this afternoon? 3:40 to 5:30
but still as slow lei.. i really think the 1K reward is really to enticing and eye catching. Futhermore, everyone's posting in here and keep upping the thread :bsmilie: ahah sure to hit 2K by tomorrow morning when I wake up... then da guy have to open sgd$1k part 2 liao.. still lose to ST1 though.. ahhahai'm cool. Lawyers and judges are busy enough already. I shall just leave this topic as entertainment. It's been a long time since I last laughed this much on CS. This kind of case would probably take more than a year before it gets heard or a verdict passed.szekiat said:YANYEWKAY, it would seem like da.photo has maligned you. You could press charges against him you know.
It most likely it wouldn't start of in the supreme court unless d.a. photo is suing me for really really big money. >250K if I remembered correctly. Or maybe he can jsut appeal and it'll go straight up there. :bsmilie:
alexlkk: subpoena is to 'command' or 'force' by legally assertions on a particular person/group to do certain things.
- Status
Similar threads
