Hacker
Senior Member
They look like Chinese toy lenses.![]()
Build quality is high though. Coating is very nice.
They look like Chinese toy lenses.![]()
Have here. Affordability is the question, at least for me it is...It's built for cinematography in mind, though.
wonglp said:
AF or not, it will be bloody expensive and no way I am getting them.
I will only pay for Leica and Zeiss.
Ok so its a 14/f2.. but no info on AF.. I would guess it is because no visible focusing marks..
The lens is a 14mm f/2.0 Super Angulon. 10 elements with 4 aspherical surfaces, plus surface coating. There are autofocus and electronic aperture control. The lens will carry a "less than 1500 Euros" launch price, whatever that means. All I can conclude is that this is a high-quality boutique lens that is beyond the budget of most m4/3 owners. I can get the trinity primes (12/2, 25/1.4, 45/1.8) for that same 1500 Euros (2400 SGD) with change leftover!
Funny thing about photography is, there will be a group of people that will spend that kind of money...
I would rather spend that money (or more) on a Leica with no AF. At least if I want to change system in future, can port over![]()
Funny thing about photography is, there will be a group of people that will spend that kind of money...
Manual SK lens.
![]()
Looks good.![]()
Some one please tell me why I would spend almost double that of the Olympus 12mm for the S-K 14mm?
Some one please tell me why I would spend almost double that of the Olympus 12mm for the S-K 14mm?