felixcat8888
Senior Member
many thanks. looks like the basics of steady hands applies as usual, haha.
hi there, i was thinking the same as you. You may wish to look at the review at thinkcamera. http://www.thinkcamera.com/news/article/mps/UAN/343/v/2/sp/
their verdict - "If I wanted to buy a bridge camera right now I'd get a Fujifilm S6500fd. If I wanted to buy a budget DSLR with a travel zoom then I'd also think long and hard about whether the S6500fd wasn't a better choice. It's between £50 and £100 cheaper than the S9600 and unless you need the extra pixels I think it's a better buy. It will also save you £100 - £200 off the price of an entry level DSLR and be somewhat easier to live with. The face detection isn't perfect - many times it just doesn't work yet but I like to see it as a handy bonus. This is a great camera with face detection thrown in."
overall, i agree with felixcat. Features-wise have to research if really need them (esp the hotshoe and command dial for manual controls) . Either case, I think both are great buys.
features wise 9600 very few extra than 6500 but 9600 might juz sway me over, notably the hotshoe, the manual command dial, the vertical swing screen (juz a novelty to me but great to let friends wow over it), both xD n CF card able. dimension wise only deeper than 6500. weight of coz heavier. price-wise can start to think abt other brands of bridge cams but stil much much lower than entry level new DSLR (savings of > $500 still significant). pic quality-wise same as 6500 from what i see.
on the other hand, 6500 has face detection altho well.. its not perfect. there's also ISO3200 for the realy crazy shots haha.
being torn between the two shows how well positioned they are with prosumers not going too wrong with either.
Weight wise, the 6500 is lighter.
