Oh... then we just compare sensors is enough?

No right? We're comparing features that make the camera goes the extra mile. If just by comparing sensors, sure, I'll agree D2H still has to catch up.
But with iTTL, CLS and much more, only you yourself will know if it matters. For sure I'll agree that the Cam2000AF is very good for all types of users from novices to professionals. The iTTL exposure and the 3D MM (sorry, it's not 3D MMII, only D2Hs is 3D MMII). Sadly, the S3 had none of the above. Sure, TTL is sufficient, but I'm pretty confident in Nikon's flash system. Especially the new iTTL and CLS. It's way better than D-TTL even.
Sure you don't need the WT (since it's an add on anyway), but 3D MM, high flash sync speed, Cam2000?
I would say D2H is a over featured camera than the S3 Pro but both about the same price range. Now, which is a better buy?
Sure again the sensor loses out, but that's all the S3 can match up? If so, then my comparison will surely stand. No hard feelings to all Fuji S3 users, but that's a fact.
Given the same price... more features... which is a better buy? The stand is clear. So back to the topic, can it outshine D2H?
If we balance the features, it's obvious, no.