isomers007
Senior Member
GXR is definitly more expensive from a long-term perspective.
Due to the "fixed lens to sensor" design the value of the lens drops from the moment you paied for it as the sensor loses its value due to technological advancement.
Each time you invest in a new lens that is coupled with a sensor made of a new technology more is paid for new technoloies are expensive.
Even if you can justify it as "cheap" by your own reasoning, "cheap" does not amount to cost saving which is achivable through an interchangable lens system.
Still, to be fair I would say I defninitly would buy myself a GXR if Ricoh had released a pancake prime lens and I hadn't bought a GF1.
same thots too. I would get one if they would release a wide prime lens (apsc). That's enuff for me. But then it would make more sense to release a grd-lookalike with an apsc prime lens like the dp1/2.