I think you meant the Tokina 16-50 f2.8 (quite expensive for a newbie, and not so good), since there is no Nikkor 16-50... Tamron 17-50 or Sigma 18-50 2.8 EX Macro HSM isbetter.
another upzz from me for this lens too. :thumbsup: value for $$ for a f/2.8 lens with good image quality. it is also sharp and contrasty. highly recommended for a newbie
that i hafta agree buddy! the weight itself is enuf to tell u that it is meant for "pro-er" shooter :bsmilie: and the price also another indication. however having said that, it sure beats the tamron/tokina/sigma in similar zoom range...
Ok from your lens choices you are talking about classical portraiture. You could use a wide angle as a portraite lens if you were trying for effects but based on classic stand point it would be difficult to get anything less than full body without distortions coming in.
Go for the 85/1.8 it' more than good enought, the 1.4 is normal a better lens when shooting at lower light levels. Let leave bolkah out of this. But rent first - look at market place there people renting.