Firefox said:LCD's don't suffer from burn-in unlike CRT's and plasmas. Since the poster didn't specify whether she/ he is using crt's or lcd's, it'd be safe to assume that she/ he has the former.
user12343 said:tink those with a rotating screen would be good when it comes to doing portraits and landscapes.
Firefox said:LCD's don't suffer from burn-in unlike CRT's and plasmas. Since the poster didn't specify whether she/ he is using crt's or lcd's, it'd be safe to assume that she/ he has the former.
silvergetz said:I think they do suffer from burn in. Some of my customer's LCD has burned marks from displaying static images 24,7.
vince123123 said:Hi guys,
I'm currently considering getting a new big LCD screen. At lesat 19 inches.
There's somewhat a wide selection available, and even within the same brand and same size, there are lots of choices available.
To assist in the discussion, here are my requirements:
1. Main use is in normal office related work, and also lots of Photoshop, Image Browsing etc. Hence, picture quality is the primary concern - colour/sharpness etc.
2. Almost never play games - hence fast response time is not necessary - however, how slow can I go?
3. Normal aspect ratio preferred to wide screen ratio. For the same inch size, normal aspect gives more pixels and is more suitable for the work that I do - mostly portrait oriented documents and photographs.
4. Currently eyeing the Dell 24 inch - yes I know its a wide screen, but it seems to be good.....but is the response time of 16ms too slow? Even consumer level ones seem to have 8ms as a norm...
5. Most of the LCDs today have specifications on brightness (in cd/m2), contrast ratio (xxx:1) and response time (x Ms) What are the minimum requirements to satisfy the main use in (1)?
6. Have been using Samsung in the past -they seem to be good. But I'm also attracted to Phillips perfect panel policy on allowing exchanges even for 1 dead pixel.
Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
kahheng said:I suggest you take a look at the Viewsonic VP 2030b - it's selling for around $1099. The 2130 is selling for about $700 more. Not worth the inch more for the price if you ask me.
Had a good look at their VX2025 for a while and, whilst I think it's a superb home-user, general purpose monitor which is unbeatable at its price, for more critical Photoshop work (on a low-end LCD), it's just unacceptable IMO: the antiglare screen has too many artifacts that can obscure some fine detail, and it can give a fairly misleading image with regards to picture noise because of these artifacts on the antiglare screen.
Of course it depends on how fussy you are as well.
I thought it was my own problem when I notice the antiglare screen's artifacts :sweat: , which put me off from buying at PC show. Dell 20" looks better to me during the show, I think partially due to VS staff don't know well in setting up their LCD for demo.kahheng said:I suggest you take a look at the Viewsonic VP 2030b - it's selling for around $1099. The 2130 is selling for about $700 more. Not worth the inch more for the price if you ask me.
Had a good look at their VX2025 for a while and, whilst I think it's a superb home-user, general purpose monitor which is unbeatable at its price, for more critical Photoshop work (on a low-end LCD), it's just unacceptable IMO: the antiglare screen has too many artifacts that can obscure some fine detail, and it can give a fairly misleading image with regards to picture noise because of these artifacts on the antiglare screen.
Of course it depends on how fussy you are as well.
zcf said:I thought it was my own problem when I notice the antiglare screen's artifacts :sweat: , which put me off from buying at PC show. Dell 20" looks better to me during the show, I think partially due to VS staff don't know well in setting up their LCD for demo.
vince123123 said:Hello Kahheng, thanks for your recommendations.
I'll check out the 2030b.
I didn't consider the VX2025 very seriously partially also because its a wide screen format, for which I have little use for.