dannynys said:Hi Vivien,
I think there are quite a number of alternatives to your problem! What I suggest is to take a look at your budget. Let me advise you on your options available
1. Close Up Filters
This is the cheapest option. However, it suffers from problems like distortion, the only place that doesn't suffer from that is the centre of the picture. I doubt you can really get macro pictures with your current lens plus this filter.
2. Third Party Lenses
This option will probably set you back around $500++. Third party lenses are just the cheaper version of the original( 50% of originals ). I got a Sigma 105mm F2.8 Macro lens. I got quite good results from this lens, in fact I am using it for my nature photography course. The only different between this and original lenses are probably the optics. Optics makes a lot of different in colour rendition and also sharpness. I would recommend this option if you are tight on budget.
3. Original Lenses
What can i say? This is the best option also the most expensive one $1000++. If you can spend on it, it will be worth the investment. Of course some say that the 2nd hand price is better. Well, of course lah, if you are spending so much, the selling price will definitely be higher!
With all said, I think getting a new lens will definitely be better than filters. If you really can't affort 3rd party lenses, I don't suggest you even to buy the filters. Sooner or later, you would want to get the lens! Macro Lenses work well both in nature macro photography and also can be used in portrait photography. It's a good investment.
Hope you will find the best option!
Cheers,
Danny Ng
Thanks Danny! That really helps! I will spend some time to really think abt all the available options.
