Hmmmm my 2 cents..
1) if you have a canon body, you can buy an adapter to use all nikon lens. Apparently manual lens work better on canon body.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/nikcan.htm
to a non-pro like me, the idea about kit wise etc is kinda silly if you have this sort of adapter around..
Am I wrong in this? I hope someone more experienced can correct me on this.
2) The pros I know hate to spend hours after a shoot editing the few hundreds/thousands of photos they get. They prefer photos which they can use straight out of the camera. (those using film and can get it right the 1st time would laugh at pple who need to do PP to get similar results).
To the original poster: I guess the point about software ends up: Do you want good photos out of the camera, or do you want good photos MAY look good after it's out of the camera.
I dare say most people's PP skill can't match camera's in-processing. Even after editing the RAW, you will get (90% of the time) close to what you get if you didn't take raw. If perpeptually get extremely underexposed photos, to me it's time you look at your photography skills instead of improving your PP. Of coz, I'm not ignoring the fact that the really good ones can get amazing effects from their PP. I'm just pointing out that FEW can do that.
It all boils down to brand loyality, and of course, the level of comfort you have with the cameras. Not many people will say they made a $1600 mistake. Not many people I know are priviledged enough to own both brands, so u can't exactly get a non biased view here..
I'll suggest you try both cameras and see which feel u like, which shutter sound u prefer, with consideration to how much PP skills you wish to pick up, and of course, how much more $$ can you spend on other stuff, like lens.
Get either, you'll be happy enough with the improvement over PnS