First of all, I have to say that I dislike comparison threads. Yet, here I am posting one!
I have been shooting a medium format TLR for about half a year or so and I've been getting great results with it. I am thinking of upgrading now. I want to try something different this time, either a rangefinder or an SLR. I've done all the research I could possibly do and I know the strengths and limitations of each system. I've even picked up rangefinders and SLRs at the shop to play with them, but I just haven't had the opportunity to shoot with either one.
I shoot mainly portraits and landscapes and I'm very used to DSLRs and TLRs. For those of you with experience with rangefinders and SLRs, which would suit my purposes better? I'm particularly concerned with a rangefinder's close-up portrait capability (Especially fixed-lens ones) and lack of DOF preview. All types of cameras can be used to take all kinds of photos, but there must be a reason why SLRs are THE cameras for portraits.
I have been shooting a medium format TLR for about half a year or so and I've been getting great results with it. I am thinking of upgrading now. I want to try something different this time, either a rangefinder or an SLR. I've done all the research I could possibly do and I know the strengths and limitations of each system. I've even picked up rangefinders and SLRs at the shop to play with them, but I just haven't had the opportunity to shoot with either one.
I shoot mainly portraits and landscapes and I'm very used to DSLRs and TLRs. For those of you with experience with rangefinders and SLRs, which would suit my purposes better? I'm particularly concerned with a rangefinder's close-up portrait capability (Especially fixed-lens ones) and lack of DOF preview. All types of cameras can be used to take all kinds of photos, but there must be a reason why SLRs are THE cameras for portraits.