First of all, sorry to ask this noob question. I've tried to done a search with "negative" and don't find the result I'm looking for. But if this has been asked before, appreciate the pointer.
Recently clearing the storeroom I bumped into quite some 35mm negative (of course all developed) taken in the old days. Realised that some of them I can re-print for some of my friends and relatives to give them as "suprise present", I asked around some neighbourhood photo printing shops to print them. I bumped into one that could do printing and converting into digital format. Happily, I sent them some 20 years old negatives.
When I collect the printed 3R, I find the result rather disappointing. Pale, no contrast, it is worse than comparing to the same photograph that was printed 20 years ago and kept till now. Also, there are some "yellowish" patches here and there. Looking at the JPEG digital images converted are no better.
I want to ask, is it given that you can't do any better than this with developed negatives that have been stored away for 20 years? Or, would some photo shop specialising in this be able to "salvage" the images? I obviously would not expect the image printed now from the stored-away-negative to be as good as when it was when the film was freshly developed 20 years ago but must it be that bad? Some of them were taken with Nikon FE and I remember the images and colour were really very good when it was printed after freshly developed....
Sorry if this is a stupid question.....:embrass:
Thanks!
Recently clearing the storeroom I bumped into quite some 35mm negative (of course all developed) taken in the old days. Realised that some of them I can re-print for some of my friends and relatives to give them as "suprise present", I asked around some neighbourhood photo printing shops to print them. I bumped into one that could do printing and converting into digital format. Happily, I sent them some 20 years old negatives.
When I collect the printed 3R, I find the result rather disappointing. Pale, no contrast, it is worse than comparing to the same photograph that was printed 20 years ago and kept till now. Also, there are some "yellowish" patches here and there. Looking at the JPEG digital images converted are no better.
I want to ask, is it given that you can't do any better than this with developed negatives that have been stored away for 20 years? Or, would some photo shop specialising in this be able to "salvage" the images? I obviously would not expect the image printed now from the stored-away-negative to be as good as when it was when the film was freshly developed 20 years ago but must it be that bad? Some of them were taken with Nikon FE and I remember the images and colour were really very good when it was printed after freshly developed....
Sorry if this is a stupid question.....:embrass:
Thanks!