No lens comes close to the Minolta 50mm Macro??
Not true, the minolta 100mm macro is as good, and it goes down to 1:1
And let's not get started on the macro lenses Leica or Contax-zeiss has
Actually, each brand will have their own supporters and detractors. Even pentax lenses are damn good as well. Before I bought my minolta, my dream camera was a Pentax LX....
Not true, the minolta 100mm macro is as good, and it goes down to 1:1
And let's not get started on the macro lenses Leica or Contax-zeiss has

Actually, each brand will have their own supporters and detractors. Even pentax lenses are damn good as well. Before I bought my minolta, my dream camera was a Pentax LX....
blurblock said:Sure.... if $$ is not a problem, ask that pro to get the "G" Lens series .... the quality will not be anywhere inferior to N or C (Any C, may it be Ca or Co). AF Speed, I am quite sure I can compare D7 AF Speed with C and N. Picture Quality largely depending on the lens, and JFI, no other Macro lens come close to Minolta 50mm f/2.8 Marco
![]()