Cap_Dingo said:I do value most of the comments posted here... sincerely, thank you.
These were just snapshots that were taken just to test out the camera and were by no means composed or set up with lights or anything else you pros do. Why I chose these photos? Coz the food had a range of colours, and coz the trees showed how blur the photo was (BTW, I WAS using a tripod but the result was still like that).
Yeah, I reckon I'm a crap photographer... comments from EVERYONE were really helpful. JSBN - mate, lighten up... if you had a look at my initial comments carefully I was not asking about composition etc... but more on clarify, contrast. Again, yes I know these are crap composition shots... and do appreciate your effort and concern to answer. It just would have been nice to have smiled while I was reading your post instead.
I'll take a serious photo one of these days and post it here for C&C. Hopefully I'd have improved by then. FYI - I'll be keeping the A1...![]()
the veg i eat is this green lei...?blurblock said:nah ... find a piece of cooked vegetable that look that colour of green .... heck .... it is already quite difficult to find fresh vege that looks that colour. The colour of other food, likewise. (I adjusted the pictures to that colour so that it looks like fresh uncooked food.... the original ones look like cooked food, the photo I adjusted makes it looks like it wasn't cooked. Great for product shot, but lousy for event shot
.... just to bring a point across there is nothing wrong with the camera
)
satay16 said:i still own the A1. it is true that canon and nikon have more vibrant colours, however, in real life, when you see the object you are taking, it isn't supposed to be THAT vibrant. Minolta cameras are famous for their "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" colours. A1, A2, 5D and 7D are all like that. so basically, canon just brings some processing steps into their camera. but sometimes(when you slowly become a pro), there are some photos that you dun want to be that over-saturated.
so if you find the photos taken by your A1 abit dull, there are two ways. photoshop or turn the "COL" knob(left of the camera) into +3. depends on your liking, i use +3 most of the time.
Damn, do I really sound so serious and nasty? Ok, here's a smileCap_Dingo said:I do value most of the comments posted here... sincerely, thank you.
These were just snapshots that were taken just to test out the camera and were by no means composed or set up with lights or anything else you pros do. Why I chose these photos? Coz the food had a range of colours, and coz the trees showed how blur the photo was (BTW, I WAS using a tripod but the result was still like that).
Yeah, I reckon I'm a crap photographer... comments from EVERYONE were really helpful. JSBN - mate, lighten up... if you had a look at my initial comments carefully I was not asking about composition etc... but more on clarify, contrast. Again, yes I know these are crap composition shots... and do appreciate your effort and concern to answer. It just would have been nice to have smiled while I was reading your post instead.
I'll take a serious photo one of these days and post it here for C&C. Hopefully I'd have improved by then. FYI - I'll be keeping the A1...![]()
eesteck said:bro I agree with u. I was using Nikon before minolta 7D. I was surprised by the diff in output. For nikon, the cam seems to automatically increase the saturation. The color is always heavier. I used Nikon D70 & KM 7D side by side for a period of time for testing and confirmed that minolta really produce natural colour.
I used dimage A1 for quite a while before DSLR, trust me it works better than any other prosumer.
michhy said:you are a crap photographer (you asked for it in your thread title...)
And you have nothing better to do than to resurrect old threads... :bsmilie:singlish said:And you are plain rude and arrogant michhy.