aktivate said:I was wondering:
If I have a 50mm f/1.8D Nikon lens - which of my mirrorless camera options above can the lens be fitted on?
Fudgecakes said:None. U would require an adaptor. Even so, since it's an AFD lens and most if not all mirrorless cameras have no screwdrive, it will remain a MF lens.
aktivate said:Pardon my ignorance & much limited knowledge on technical jargons but what's BnS? 45 f/1.8 is prime lens? If so, the lens has AF capabilities?
The "R" Kit lens comes with both EP3 and EPL3 right? Thanks.
aktivate said:I learnt about OM-D yesterday, waaaaaaay too over my budget. I've basically narrowed down to the :
E-P3 / E-PL3 : Seems to be a very popular choice with alot of resources available online for newbies like me.
GX1 : I've seen the reviews and it seems to be a major contender
NEX-C7 : From my limited knowledge, I understand that this has the largest censor, so it probably has the best quality image? Also I learn that the price is not attractive nor is the range of lenses so theres my dilemma.
Nikon J1: Not sure about this camera but I read somewhere that it has the fastest AF in it's class.....Will read more about it today.
aktivate said:The Nikon D3000 I've tried has no in-body autofocus motor so imagine my frustrations when I used a prime lens on it lol. Nightmare. Out of 100 shots of my fidgety kid, perhaps 70 are blurred and those which are not blurred didn't exactly capture that particular moment lol!
Fudgecakes said:None. U would require an adaptor. Even so, since it's an AFD lens and most if not all mirrorless cameras have no screwdrive, it will remain a MF lens.
Blur Shadow said:I'd imagine An adapter will be too cumbersome!
So mirrorless is the way to go then. Try out the cameras at the stores la. if u are afraid of the salespeople being grumpy then just go to any of the showrooms/megastores to try them out. If u had more budget I would recommend the Fuji xpro1. It has a OVF and EVF hybrid So it should be nicer to use if you like the "through the lens" look although it is not really TTL. it's focussing have been slammed as slow/inaccurate recently(forgot which) but perhaps u could consider it?
aktivate said:Hi, a full DSLR is out of the qn for me. I prefer a compact & lightweight alternative (if possible).
i'm looking to capture candid (bokeh) photos of my baby with ease. I'm not expecting 100% capture success but at least the camera's technology should be able to help me with this.
Is the kit-lens suffice? If I wish to add another lens to improve or give me more alternatives, what would you guys recommend and also a ball-park price on these lenses that are recommended so I can start giving my mrs the heads-up and coax her alittle more lol.
Candid is not "bokeh", nor is there a "bokeh photo". Please understand that bokeh does not mean background blur. Please don't anyhow use terms you do not understand.
Considering that background blur is easier to achieve with a thinner DOF, thus a higher-aperture lens is good, I would recommend something like a 50mm f/1.8 lens.
FYI, the DOF will be thinner on a larger sensor, such as in the NEX series (which also gives you tracking AF, face detection, etc etc etc). A common complaint of m4/3 owners is that thin DOF and a blurrier background can be harder to achieve with the smaller sensor on the m4/3 cameras compared to APS-C sized sensor cameras.
Good to learn that complaints of m4/3 owners difficulty on the blurrier background but it is still achievable with the right lens and it's proper usage right?