Please advice!!!

[Sing Liang]

Hahaha what if the person doesn't know which lens to buy between 2, maybe doing a comparison. But he surely knows that he needs them? So he just need more suggestions.

Yes, Just like I ask about canon 10-22 and tokin 11-14.

 

[Sing Liang]

No worries. 10-22mm is a very good lens.

Yes, I love it!!!

 

[Csboi]

Yes, I love it!!!

Hahaha if you free can come out to shoot together, but I am very new to photography, so pardon me for my noobness. Hahaha at the same time can borrow your 10-22mm to poison myself a bit.

 

[Sing Liang]

Hahaha if you free can come out to shoot together, but I am very new to photography, so pardon me for my noobness. Hahaha at the same time can borrow your 10-22mm to poison myself a bit.

Haha, sure!

 

[Csboi]

Haha, sure!

Hahaha like what the others have mentioned, if you are really lazy about bringing so many lenses out, then get 18-200 or something like that. It would be better. Hahaha

 

[tecnica]

But canon canon 18-55 kit lens is a very good lens!! Maybe I will just sell 55-250 for 70-200 2.8

why do you need to replace the 55-250?

 

[Sing Liang]

why do you need to replace the 55-250?

I want lens with 2.8

 

[tecnica]

i feel that your logic is flawed. why do you need to bring all your lenses to wherever you go? pick and choose the appropriate ones for what you are going to shoot, no need to lug every single lens around.

and why 24-70L and 70-200L? sounds like some L-BBB to me.

 

[Csboi]

why do you need to replace the 55-250?

He finds the photos not sharp enough. :bsmilie:

 

[tecnica]

I want lens with 2.8

are you willing to bear the weight? f2.8 zooms ain't feather light, 24-70L + 70-200 f2.8L - easily over 2.5kg, not counting camera body and other accessories.

 

[Sing Liang]

are you willing to bear the weight? f2.8 zooms ain't feather light, 24-70L + 70-200 f2.8L - easily over 2.5kg, not counting camera body and other accessories.

Worth for long term!

 

[Sing Liang]

Hmm, I think I just use 10-22, 18-55 and 55-250 for now.

Thanks everyone for your help~!

 

[tecnica]

Worth for long term!

go man-handle the lens first before you make any conclusion.

i opted for the 70-200L f4 IS version solely due to the weight and how travel friendly it is.

performance wise, it is 99% that of the f2.8 IS II, minus the wider aperture.

 

[SkyStrike]

Hmm, I think I just use 10-22, 18-55 and 55-250 for now.

Thanks everyone for your help~!

I don't really see what's the problem with this setup...was using the exact setup till my 18-55 died and upgraded it to 17-50. Chances are if my 18-55 did not get KIA, I may have stick with it.

 

[Sing Liang]

Understand! Will stick to this 3 lens! =)

 

[HazeMaze]

10-250, u had covered every inch with minor overlapping. Mayb u can pratice carry any 2 lens for shooting. By thinking ahead what's ur environment and ur subjects can save u some troubles.

 

[Csboi]

10-250, u had covered every inch with minor overlapping. Mayb u can pratice carry any 2 lens for shooting. By thinking ahead what's ur environment and ur subjects can save u some troubles.

Is there such lens? 10-250?

 

[wonglp]

Is there such lens? 10-250?

I suppose he meant coverage of 10-250mm with TS 3 lenses.

 

[Rashkae]

Is there such lens? 10-250?

No... He's referring to the focal length coverage of the lenses you have now... "Hmm, I think I just use 10-22, 18-55 and 55-250 for now."

 

[rhino123]

Is there such lens? 10-250?

no. there isn't.