Picture from RX1

[Errz]

Meow by Errz, on Flickr

 

[aaron80]

Some contributions.

1) Prowling


2) Lazing


3) What do you want?

 

[Errz]

Some contributions.

yeah.thread is dying. :bsmilie:

 

[aaron80]

The RX1/RX1R are very good cameras leh. Cannot let this thread die!:bsmilie:

yeah.thread is dying. :bsmilie:

 

[Errz]

Random by Errz, on Flickr

 

[Errz]

The RX1/RX1R are very good cameras leh. Cannot let this thread die!:bsmilie:

hard leh.......

 

[Thoth]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/errz/9477254538/
Random by Errz, on Flickr

Bro. Very good camera must shoot more n post la. All so shy one meh??

 

[Errz]

Bro. Very good camera must shoot more n post la. All so shy one meh??

think only handful RX1 owner. thats why the post rate is low here :bsmilie:

 

[Thoth]

think only handful RX1 owner. thats why the post rate is low here :bsmilie:

So u recommend to buy d priced down RX1 or d new RX1R?

 

[Errz]

So u recommend to buy d priced down RX1 or d new RX1R?

guess u have read most of the review of RX1-R and notice the same comment about the difference.

Sony RX1R
"given that the Rx1 and Rx1N are identical except for the AA filter, is there a difference in sharpness between the two, and is moire a real-world issue?

The answer to the first question is – yes. There is a difference. The Rx1N is sharper. But as with the Nikon 800e vs the 800, the difference is very small. In fact, my experience is that only in direct on-screen side-by-side comparisons at 100% magnification is that difference really noticeable. Also, once an image has been properly sharpened with an experienced eye, that difference become de minimis. I should mention though that when sharpening, the amount of sharpening required is noticeably less with the Rx1N, so this is both a subjective and an objective observation."

i'm just using the lightroom default sharpening and already find it sharp enuff. so its up to u if the price diff. is worth it or not.

 

[MacDaddy]

Sarah Lorraine Seow by Marc Seow, on Flickr

 

[MacDaddy]

Sarah Seow by Marc Seow, on Flickr

 

[MacDaddy]

Ashley Seow by Marc Seow, on Flickr

 

[Thoth]

guess u have read most of the review of RX1-R and notice the same comment about the difference.

Sony RX1R
"given that the Rx1 and Rx1N are identical except for the AA filter, is there a difference in sharpness between the two, and is moire a real-world issue?

The answer to the first question is – yes. There is a difference. The Rx1N is sharper. But as with the Nikon 800e vs the 800, the difference is very small. In fact, my experience is that only in direct on-screen side-by-side comparisons at 100% magnification is that difference really noticeable. Also, once an image has been properly sharpened with an experienced eye, that difference become de minimis. I should mention though that when sharpening, the amount of sharpening required is noticeably less with the Rx1N, so this is both a subjective and an objective observation."

i'm just using the lightroom default sharpening and already find it sharp enuff. so its up to u if the price diff. is worth it or not.

Seems priced down RX1 is quite a good deal then.

 

[Errz]

Seems priced down RX1 is quite a good deal then.

bbb..then save up for FF NEX instead of M240 :bsmilie:

 

[Thoth]

bbb..then save up for FF NEX instead of M240 :bsmilie:

Yeah. FF NEX. When will it come?

 

[keroy]

Straight OOC JPEG. High MC effect.

 

[Errz]

Yeah. FF NEX. When will it come?

u've been following the rumours right. so u know what i know. :bsmilie:

use ur X-E1 first lor.

 

[Thoth]

u've been following the rumours right. so u know what i know. :bsmilie:

use ur X-E1 first lor.

Rumor has it. 23rd Sept is d launch. But dunno if its A or E mount FF NEX. Haha.

 

[agawads]

Rumor has it. 23rd Sept is d launch. But dunno if its A or E mount FF NEX. Haha.

FF NEX is reserved for e-mount, but hybrid possible.