To reply to Ur main question. Yes! I m happy with eos m. But I guess I will b happier getting kit 3 rather than kit 2.
There are no perfect camera. Each has its pros n cons. eosM is a small n good camera. Choose it over my 6d for my CNy visit.
There are people who will complain abt it's AF. But it seems that most who complain don't own it. So well as a user, I can say that its not very fast. But it's not slow either.
One thing gd abt getting a eosM is that it has access to lots of lens and accessories designed for Ef mount. Eg I can mount lensbaby, Diana f lens on it thru the widely available adaptor.
It's a little camera with lots in it.
Hi, is there a reason you prefer a Kit III over the Kit II?
I'm seriously considering The EOS M and will like to get some input.
Had the 7D and 16-35/24-70 MkI, Manfrotto tripod/ballhead but sold all those with the SpeedEx
They were too large and cumbersome for my usage; saw little time outside the dry cabinet.
I'm hoping the EOS M will stick this time; small compact hence encouraging me to venture outdoors with it.
Most of my previous use was indoor, macro and portrait.
I seem to take more photos of my home audio equipment, music physical media, video recording too.
Also take the impromptu food photos and floral shots.
The external mic input is useful for me (though missing headphone monitoring)
just wondering if the 18-55 will be something I'd use.
Kit II at $559 locally seems hard to beat now or is there a better deal elsewhere?
Some used kits don't seem to be priced relative to current MSRP.
Wall of text I know; thanks in advance.