Wai said:i dun think dual core or dual processors will help much for photoshop
Firefox said:The one with at least 2GB of memory (@ DDR400 or faster) and the fastest storage sub-system.
Technically, the 3.8GHz EE will lead the way. Especially if you have dual-channel, DDR400 memory running at low-latencies.
But I've won dual-cores and faster processors in PS CS2 with my Prescott 3.0 just because of a faster storage sub-system.. So anything goes..
kahheng said:You know the version of PS is also relevant.
In PS 7.01, 2:00
In PS CS2, 1:30
P4 3.0C, 2 gig of DDR400 value ram running at slowest ram timings.
My dinky Thinkpad running a Pentium M 1.5Ghz with 1 gig of RAM did 2:31 using PS 7.01 (I don't have CS2 installed on the laptop). The timings were uncannily the same using CS.
Zerstorer said:Slighty OT, but still on photo processing.
Things will be more exciting when Opteron 875s are out. 2x875s can process a D2x Raw in just 2 seconds in Bibble.
Wai said:hmm....
Let me try on my Dual Xeon 3Ghz, Prescott 3.6Ghz dual core, Pentium 820 dual core and Pentium 3.8Ghz Extreme Edition
guess which will be fastest?
anka said:wah 875. where got money to buy sia. 254s already considering whether it's cost effective liao. MB for 8 series is crazy. 8x dual cores AMD. lol no money to invest such monster. where you get specs to see 2 sec sia..
dont say 875..
the 275 already $1.5k+ per CPU.
Zerstorer said:So Wai, where are the benchmarks?
Zerstorer said:It was tested 5-6mths ago on pre-production sets.
Here's the drool factor:
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/colfax_dual_opteron/page9.asp
As Photoshop is a known SMP aware program, I'm pretty sure that it does.Wai said:let me prove if dual processor vs dual core vs hyperthreading will make any different on photoshop
user12343 said:70sec on a AMD Athlon 64 3800+, 1gb DDR ram, CS2
Phildate said:Dual 2.7 Powermac G5 with 4Gb Ram: 46 secs