That guy had better apologize before things get even hotter n this could be veri unsightly for canongrapherL to stay as a clubsnapper ...
Are you making a personal threat? This can be intepreted wrongly and result in police actions against you.
That guy had better apologize before things get even hotter n this could be veri unsightly for canongrapherL to stay as a clubsnapper ...
So, you think I wanted to stand up to shoot? There's of course reasons to why I need to stand up and shoot ... If you do not know the situation there, do not post based on ur facts.
Why don't you state your reasons instead of saying that there are such reasons?
Are you the official photographer?
Is there a NEED for you to get the photos?
Why are you questioning on the NEED to get the photos ...Why don't you state your reasons instead of saying that there are such reasons?
Are you the official photographer?
Is there a NEED for you to get the photos?
How can the photographer be a pro if he decides to use a lens that gains him maximum dislike + maximum disturbance to everyone else whom the event was intended for? The event was not created for the "pro" photographer to take photos right?I won't agree with u on this .... as the pro photographer is however using a short lens ... and this somehow make it difficult to shoot fm a distance .... if u are using only a 50mm lens how would u do if u want to snap a close shot of the dancer or the singer on stage ..... :think: think abt it .... dun juz give example ... Juz my 1 cent worth
Are you making a personal threat? This can be intepreted wrongly and result in police actions against you.
u have interpreted wrongly ... please read the thread properly dun blindly make comment ...
I understand. That's why I'm asking for him to tell us about it.non official photogs have NEEDs too
If you're prepared to go great lengths to get your photos, then you should be prepared for the criticism that you get for going the length.Why are you questioning on the NEED to get the photos ...
Why even bother to take out the camera if you do not intend to get any images. Such a statement shows that you can't be bothered in things you that do ...
u have interpreted wrongly ... please read the thread properly dun blindly make comment ...
Could you tell us the correct interpretation then so people won't misunderstand?
So, your statement suggests that it isn't necessary for non official photographers to get the images?I understand. That's why I'm asking for him to tell us about it.
If you're prepared to go great lengths to get your photos, then you should be prepared for the criticism that you get for going the length.
In the first place my statement is veri clear liao .... threadstarter apologize before things get out of hand .... if unseen cannot understand this statement that i commented then I think best he stay out of this thread ...
In the first place my statement is veri clear liao .... threadstarter apologize before things get out of hand .... if unseen cannot understand this statement that i commented then I think best he stay out of this thread ...
This is not a nuisance at all ...Moreover its public places .... anyone cam first can have their own right to do wat they see deem fit .... its first come first serve .... those come later juz have to bear with it .... :sticktong
If U want to tok abt such nuisance here then u are really a coward .... come forward n tell them off lah .... no need to post in here n tok abt such prob ... if u got guts come out n tok lah ... bo chee ar .... :sticktong
If i'm reading the thread as canongrapherL, I might have made a police report because I'm being forced to take a course of action i wasn't taking, and if I didn't I'd be faced with something I wouldn't like to happen.
Can you explain your statement then?
wellSo, your statement suggests that it isn't necessary for non official photographers to get the images?
And its right to post an image of an individual and defame him though its happening round the world?
It's obvious that you're a person who's isn't interested in things you're doing. If I'm there not to get images, I'll rather not take out my camera ...
So am I correct to say that you are saying as follows:
"Threadstarter, you better apologise before things get out of hand".
Is this what you mean?
What the hell are you trying to do, I demand a public apology (at least, in this thread) for this ...
As wat Yilishengxian has oredi posted in bold
Isn't it veri clear to u ....wat Im referring ???
I'm just pointing out that your statement is positively hostile. Why would canongrapherL's existance in CS be affected since there are other forumers agreeing with him? Unless you are going to make it "unsightly"?I think u are being hostile .... if the threadstarter sees this he would have make a comment to say something but not posting pic to tell the world wat happen to the audience who kena block by a photographer who merely stand n sit for juz 1 sec ...
YLSX just asked for an apology that's it
From what I see you are writing, you are saying:
"Threadstarter, you better apologise before things get out of hand".
Please confirm or deny. I'm asking what you are saying, not what YLSX is saying.