It's not a new product, only capable of taking SD movies. The first version that came out was the SDR100 followed by this. The difference between the 2 is the sdhc support, of which is only capable on the SDR150, and the way in which the mic is embedded in the later version. The form factor is the greatest asset of this camcorder. In bright light, you will get sharp images, but it tends to get grainy in low light conditions. The DVD quality is only present in the MPEG2 format, but not the quality like that you see in DVD movies.
most probably SDR-S150... if not why do people still want to spent extra $ on a heavier, more expensive video cam when a compact digicam can get better quality... :dunno: :bsmilie:In term of Video quality between TX1 and SDR-S150, which would give better quality in normal and low lights?
most probably SDR-S150... if not why do people still want to spent extra $ on a heavier, more expensive video cam when a compact digicam can get better quality... :dunno: :bsmilie:
If you use SDHC cards, what backup device will you use that accepts SDHC cards? Another consideration is that 4GB SDHC Class 4 cards are relatively cheap, maybe in the region of $65 to $85. How will the camcorder be carried around? What kind of place is this?
most probably SDR-S150... if not why do people still want to spent extra $ on a heavier, more expensive video cam when a compact digicam can get better quality... :dunno: :bsmilie:
Is 4GB SD or SDHC card available in SG?
I read the review of of TX1, it seems it performs well in both still and video - and its capable of support HD.
Like you, I am sceptical that TX1 can be better than S150, it does not make sense that S150 more expensive than TX1 but TX1 better than S150.
Anyone tested TX1 and feedback if the quality is viewable on TV? How about S150? Anyone can put a video online for comparison.
The TX1 is outright junk compared to the SDR-S150 for taking videos. In fact, the TX-1 is junk, it is nether good at taking photos nor videos. There are many videocams out there that are better than both, but relatively speaking, the SDR-S150 will beat the pants off the TX-1.
http://www.ideaphotos.com/Panasonic/SDR-S150.html
I looked at the video on the above URL, if S150 is going to give such quality above, I doubt I would consider it. Is that the quality I should expect from S150 or the user didnt do it correctly or S150 was framed - it was another camcorder?!?
The video was from another camcorder as mentioned in the website AND for heaven's sake don't use you tube videos to judge quality. :bsmilie:
suspected about the OIS thingy... it could easily kill your batt unless you are on AC. :bsmilie:tried a A/B comparison test on SDR H250 and JVC GZ-MG505.
Prefer JVC GZ-MG505 (sharper, clearer, low light ok, ZERO LUX, etc ) though it is few hundred dollars more. JVC GZ-MG505 are more designed for video taking.
Hence, brought the JVC GZ-MG505 home & now charging.
Big Thanks to you all.
learn from salesman:
OIS of panasonic SDR S150, H250 are only in camera mode. For Video mode, there is no OIS. SDR S150, H250 are more meant for camera. Video taking are just a additional features. blah blah...
learn from salesman:
OIS of panasonic SDR S150, H250 are only in camera mode. For Video mode, there is no OIS. SDR S150, H250 are more meant for camera. Video taking are just a additional features. blah blah...