Olympus OM Users


Status
Not open for further replies.
is OM-3 and OM-4 much more expensive?

i am considering an OM-2n, is spot metering on OM-2SP useful? i read that SP stands for Spot-Programme, anyone can feedback of how is OM-2SP comparing to OM-2n? thanks.

I remember OM3T used to cost as much as M-6. About 2000~3000$.

OM4T was about half the price of OM3T. OM2sp half the price of OM4T.
 

If u can afford, get OM3T or OM4T. All have similiar built as OM1, weight and dimensions.
OM3T is fully mechanical version of OM1 with spot metering
OM4T is improved version of OM2Sp.
OM3/4 T or no T, have OTF and flash syn at all speed with F280 flash.
OTF was OM's innovation.
T for titanium body
OTF= Off-The-Film TTL light metering, sensor measures light reflected off the film for auto exposure.
OM2 is AE version of OM1
OM2sp spot metering version of OM2, but with battery leak problem.
OM1 has the classical look, uses Hg battery and metering is less responsive.. shutter flip sounds is rather "seductive".


My OM shots were all loaded at www.geocities.com/boochap. The scan qualities was lousy, was using minolta dual III last time.

The battery leak problem is only found in the early batch of OM4, not known for OM2SP.
 

what i read is OM2SP and OM4 early batch got affected, and for OM4 batch if you battery check will auto off 30s then it is the later batch.

anyone got affected and how to fix it?
 

hi guys, how much it was when OM-4Ti was introduced to market? around $1k?
 

what i read is OM2SP and OM4 early batch got affected, and for OM4 batch if you battery check will auto off 30s then it is the later batch.

anyone got affected and how to fix it?

The battery drain problem, the battery will die within a day or less.

Have to change the circuit board to solve the problem or some user will switch the mode to "B" to prevent battery drain. However, the spare parts has been discon long time ago.
 

hi guys, how much it was when OM-4Ti was introduced to market? around $1k?

When the OM-4Ti first launched, price at $1200 and gradually increased to $1600 sold at some place. I decided on the OM-4Ti (based on the built, multi spot metering and other features) over the Nikon F3 with no regret.
 

i read the OM series manual, http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_brochuresmanuals.asp

for OM-2SP, if you set programme mode, and set the aperture smallest number, then the camera will automatically set aperture and shutter for shot? it seems this programme mode is not on OM-4T anymore..

For OM-4T, there are spot metering and can go up to 8 point and becomes multi-spot metering.. actually i wonder is multi-spot metering makes sense? the example using for it is a ballet dancer sitting beside a bright big windows..so multi-spot meter the dancer, the indoor wall left and right side.. but i feel like just single-spot the dancer may just do the job right? if the dancer needs same exposure with the wall, then multi-spot is meaning less, and if dancer and wall needs different level exposure, you got to choose that you want dancer or wall to be the 'right' exposure you want..

i wonder how OM users have opinion on those different exposure on different OM bodies?
 

I suppose multi-spot was an alternative to matrix or evaluative metering available in other brands of cameras.

Multispot allowed you to determine which parts of the scene were important and the metering system would provided an exposure value that would be suitable for that range in exposure difference. I suppose this was more accurate and allows user greater control over exposure, but was slower than matrix or evaluative metering.

Personally I prefer centre-weighted metering with a spot metering & exposure lock ability.
OM-2SP would probably be sufficient for my requirements but would still prefer a OM-4T.
However I'm quite satisfied with my OM-2n (bang for the buck) and can't justify spending more than $400 for a OM-4T.
 

Anybody familiar with 16mm or 18mm zuiko, tell me your experience? Which lens more fun? Seems like the prices are more affordable now.. Thanks!


p.s. i am talking about manual zuiko, without the "D".
 

Anybody familiar with 16mm or 18mm zuiko, tell me your experience? Which lens more fun? Seems like the prices are more affordable now.. Thanks!


p.s. i am talking about manual zuiko, without the "D".

I'm having the 18mm Zuiko and it is a fantastic super wide angle lens and comes in handy if my 21/3.5 can't do the job. As usual for super wide angle lens, the person must stay away from the edge of the frame. Else the person will inevitably get distorted.

To use filter, you need to use the 49 to 72 step up ring which is hard to find.
Alternatively the Tokina 17/3.5 is a good alternative too at a much cheaper price.

I don't have the 16mm FE lens and this is a very compact lens. However, if I have this lens, I don't think it would be used as often as the 18mm due to the FE effect.
 

Teo, Thanks for the info!

Third party or generic 49 to 72 step up ring should be easily available, right?
 

my dad has an om-1 with a makinon 35-105 f3.5-4.5.

a peek through the viewfinder gives me a clouded view. the lens is super fungused, and the flash hotshoe seems to be cracked as well. any idea how i could salvage this old timer, or is it even worth doing so? :)
 

received a mint condition oly OM-1 today. 35 years old according to the original owner - bought in 1972.

where may I find the necessary silver?/mercury? battery to power the light meter? any clue anyone?

thanks
 

Teo, Thanks for the info!

Third party or generic 49 to 72 step up ring should be easily available, right?

You're welcome.
No problem for me cos I'm having the original 49 to 72 step up ring.;).

Oh yes by the way, the 16mm FE has built in colour fiters.


cheers
 

my dad has an om-1 with a makinon 35-105 f3.5-4.5.

a peek through the viewfinder gives me a clouded view. the lens is super fungused, and the flash hotshoe seems to be cracked as well. any idea how i could salvage this old timer, or is it even worth doing so? :)

Not sure is the clouded view finder due to the lens fungus or the fungus on the viewfinder itself?

Well, I don't think is worth the cost to have the lens cleaned. Use it as a paper weight instead. Better to get used lenses instead and if you are keen, I've the Zuiko 28/F3.5 and Zuiko 75 to 150/F4 to sell.

As minor crack for the cracked hot shoe, use epoxy glue for it. At least able to "extend" the life of it. A second hand hot shoe is hard to find these days.


cheers
 

received a mint condition oly OM-1 today. 35 years old according to the original owner - bought in 1972.

where may I find the necessary silver?/mercury? battery to power the light meter? any clue anyone?

thanks


Congrats on a rare gem.
It is not easy to find the MR9 mercury battery (1.35v) and you cannot use the LR44 (1.5v) as substitute where it will give you a false reading.

Alternatively you can look for the battery converter something like :
http://www.smallbattery.company.org.uk/sbc_mr9_adapter.htm

Or DIY version :
http://olympus.dementia.org/Hardware/PDFs/batt-adapt-US.pdf


Good luck.
cheers
 

my dad has an om-1 with a makinon 35-105 f3.5-4.5.

a peek through the viewfinder gives me a clouded view. the lens is super fungused, and the flash hotshoe seems to be cracked as well. any idea how i could salvage this old timer, or is it even worth doing so? :)

My OM1 got funugs at glass behind viewfinder but no problem for shooting. ;)
However selling soon as never use and it's a waste to keep in dry cabi.
 

@ Lens. I think the random pattern there for the light meter to take a reading before the shutter curtains open. You'll be able to see it if you set it to MLU mode.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top