[ Olympus Colours ] - Show Your Blues, Greens and Reds!


Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, it's more than one difference.

1. different time of the day taking photos
2. different angle i.e. top down vs bottom up
3. different camera E500 vs E300
4. different setting (metering, aperture, shutter speed ......)
5. different camera man
6. different day Rainy day vs sun shine day

so it gives different result (photos) of course.

Cheers,
Definitely true, but I still think that the fact that the bright sky is not taking up a large portion of the picture makes a huge (biggest) difference. Excluding the sky creates a different angle. The E-300 has the same CCD as the E-500, so assuming the same lens is used that should not make a difference. #5 is not a big deal, except that a more experienced person immediately would see how to take a picture like that. The image itself is otherwise not very demanding, sorry, in my opinion no experience is needed to take such image, except some basic understanding of photography and how light can make or destroy an image. It is lesson number one that rainy (actually more like cloudy) days are better for photography than bright sun, unfortunately we can not control that all the time and my not have a second chance to come back another day, so we have to adjust other parameters, like excluding the sky and camera settings and angle. It is also possible to compensate for the sun.
 

Nice macros microcosm... but maybe moving the subjects further away from the white wall can minimise the shadows cast. Using the Olympus RF-11 or third-party?
I agree, very nice images but definitely not macros. I would not even call them close-ups, but close-up is not defined so close-ups may be called but not macro, which is a definition.
 

more purple in the evening. Just join E-system, had to learn more.....
346655914_436005f3e6.jpg
 

Hi teonglai, just pointing out that there's vignetting at the corners of that shot you posted.

Which lens were you using, and what filter was mounted on?
 

Hi teonglai, just pointing out that there's vignetting at the corners of that shot you posted.

Which lens were you using, and what filter was mounted on?

Ha.... it is my fault. Taken the photo with UV filter + unbrand CPL. Next time, will take out the UV first. The photo taken with 14-45 kit lens.
 

Hehehe, all I can say is.. been there, done that! :bsmilie:
 

Definitely true, but I still think that the fact that the bright sky is not taking up a large portion of the picture makes a huge (biggest) difference. Excluding the sky creates a different angle. The E-300 has the same CCD as the E-500, so assuming the same lens is used that should not make a difference. #5 is not a big deal, except that a more experienced person immediately would see how to take a picture like that. The image itself is otherwise not very demanding, sorry, in my opinion no experience is needed to take such image, except some basic understanding of photography and how light can make or destroy an image. It is lesson number one that rainy (actually more like cloudy) days are better for photography than bright sun, unfortunately we can not control that all the time and my not have a second chance to come back another day, so we have to adjust other parameters, like excluding the sky and camera settings and angle. It is also possible to compensate for the sun.

:thumbsup: I agree with what you said.

Thank you for your detailed explaination
 

eh... some from mine, i like contrast,so the color might be too rich for some...

_9160423.jpg



_9160427.jpg



_7232072.jpg
 

Agghhh!! bird flu!!!!..

Nice..:D
 

WOw! I'm inspired to go 'shoot-bird' later! ;)
 

oris..don't you wish you stayed..:D..it's still not too late. 2nd hand E-300 very cheap now.
 

Hi chianchiek, just a little nitpicking here.

Better to get the fly from the front, its compound eyes give excellent detail.

The reds on the ixoras are slightly oversaturated, nothing much wrong, colour is just a little dull.

Great shot on the dew drops on the moss, could use a little bit more DOF.

The dead chick is a little on the graphic side (ok, it's probably just me, I'm more comfortable with human corpses than animal ones! :sweat: ).

But excellent composition and great captures on that sunbird! :thumbsup:
 

Back to blues, subject and place illustrated in the first image...

347801237_bb9cbf6be0_o.jpg




347801214_ef1e6322b3_o.jpg




347801225_dad37e372f_o.jpg




347801228_2f3653005e_o.jpg




347801232_9d0b3d89a3_o.jpg
 

cs912364501bg8.jpg

Balinese Gamelan Musical Instrument..
E-1 + ZD 14-54
 

Hi chianchiek, just a little nitpicking here.

Better to get the fly from the front, its compound eyes give excellent detail.

The reds on the ixoras are slightly oversaturated, nothing much wrong, colour is just a little dull.

Great shot on the dew drops on the moss, could use a little bit more DOF.

The dead chick is a little on the graphic side (ok, it's probably just me, I'm more comfortable with human corpses than animal ones! :sweat: ).

But excellent composition and great captures on that sunbird! :thumbsup:

Thanks for the comment, I did try to capture the side view and the compound eyes of the fly, but some how my flash setting was still too harsh to the overall exposure. The back side view of the fly was captured at the moment b4 it flied away~ I hope it gives a sense of 'dynamic' in that image, hehe...

For the dew drops, you can see another version below which was captured using smaller aperture. I prefer the blur version as it reminds me of a song called 'return to innocence' by Enigma, in the mtv of this song, everything was in backward/anti-gravity motion, the water drops in that image looks like it flied away from the moss~

As for the dead chick, hehe.... seriously, i don't think i'll be comfortable with any human corpses, not that i'm comfortable with dead chick, but comparatively, i'll prefer to see small animal corpses rather than real size human body~~~:sweat:

fly test shot
_9240509.jpg



another dew drops shot
_A070745.jpg
 

The dew drop images has this very christmasy feel to it!

Great captures again.
 

Thanks for the comment, I did try to capture the side view and the compound eyes of the fly, but some how my flash setting was still too harsh to the overall exposure. The back side view of the fly was captured at the moment b4 it flied away~ I hope it gives a sense of 'dynamic' in that image, hehe...

fly test shot
_9240509.jpg

No flash used on this small fly. You may chase them away :bsmilie:

Here's my test shot of 50mm F2 macro lens and 1.4 teleconvertor

http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=31338
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top