No Horse Run
Member
hi everyone
just sharing with all of u .. enjoy.
just sharing with all of u .. enjoy.




You might want to consider uploading the photo to airliners.net. A quick check reveals that there're only one photo of that particular plane, and only two for the entire airline on their database. :thumbsup:
The website is awsome ... :thumbsup:
Sorry for off-topic. I see many avaition fans here like me. Anyone here fly Flight Simulator 2004 or Flight simulator X? I have been using it since 2002. Have learned a lot of flying from it. Someday im going to buy a DSLR and join you people.
btw here is some amazing screenshot from FS
http://forums.ifdg.net/index.php?showforum=15
Probably this is as close as you can get to a B707 in Singapore.hi everyone, just sharing with all of u .. enjoy.
![]()
Hi guys.
Didn't know there are so many aircraft spotters here. We should have a ClubSnap spotters outing sometime. Haha.
If anyone's interested, some of my pics can be found here: http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=40874
Those that made it into JetPhotos.net, that is..
You can refer to this, any photos that meets these criteria are most likely to get rejected. One of Singapore's top aviation photographer is Andrew Hunt, and AFAIK, he's also one of the photo screeners. I wonder if he's in this forum? :think:Your shots have the standards. I don't know how airliners.net pick their photos.
nice shots! wondering where was the 744 taken?
cheers!
I'm not sure if you realise this, but that Fokker-50 UTA (together with tail numbers 710, 712 & 713) is actually modified for ELINT and SIGINT operations. Informations are in the public-domain, and all opsec procedures are observed.
I'm not sure if you realise this, but that Fokker-50 UTA (together with tail numbers 710, 712 & 713) is actually modified for ELINT and SIGINT operations. Informations are in the public-domain, and all opsec procedures are observed.
As far as landings are concerned, i heard that airbuses have a higher AoA during landing due to the alpha floor protection mode, whereas boeing aircrafts can approch the runway at higher Vs ratio resulting in a lower AoA.I like that A330. Airbuses always has higher nose pitch than boeings at every phases of flight. Making me really feel that they are 'gliding on air' as their wing flexs up
The thing is, those equipments are probably modular. So sometimes you see them, and sometimes you don't. Sneaky little...affirmative .. looking at those nos of antennas & sensors it has ....
yea, i notice A320 and B737 AoA is not so different.As far as landings are concerned, i heard that airbuses have a higher AoA during landing due to the alpha floor protection mode, whereas boeing aircrafts can approch the runway at higher Vs ratio resulting in a lower AoA.
I did asked some pilots before, and they actually mentioned that there's no significant difference in the AoA between (specifically) the A320 and B737 during landings. :think:
yea, i notice A320 and B737 AoA is not so different.
In yr 1st paragraphy, you mean that becoz of alpha floor protection, airbus allows their aircrafts to fly at higher AoA to achieve lower speed during landing AND not compromise chances of stall?
I hope you understand what i'm trying to say![]()
Right,
So Airbus's Alpha floor protection actually strengthens the floor (of course). That way there is a reduction of wear/tear.
Correct me if I'm wrong, caused I'm still studying :X
Cowz.