NIKON: Which lens compliments D7000 the best

[An drew]

4 - 5 years :bigeyes:

The AF-S motor for the lens is still good ? :think:

This is perhaps one weakness of the older 18-200. I had to replace mine once.

 

[kwttan]

how about Tokina 16-50 2.8, it doesnt have VC.. do u think VC is important ?? Nikon 17-55 is way out of my budget for now.. I am looking for something less than 1000 bucks, and for the tamron 17-50 AF problem, its a subjective problem.. not everyone has it..

If your budget is 1k, perhaps consider tamron 17-50 f/2.8, new one costs around 900, don't forget the filter perhaps another 50 bucks (depends which brand and shop you buy from). And do your homework before buying.

 

[akashmodi]

Ok so the two major contenders coming out are 18-200 nikkor VRII and Tamron/Sigma 17-50 ... Is it worth it to spend 300 extra bucks to get the VC version for tamron ? I don't think Sigma has a VC version ??:think:

 

[akashmodi]

900 bucks for VC version right ? How about the non VC version and for that matter how about sigma 17-50 ?

 

[Daoyin]

The new Sigma 17-50mm has an OS feature.