rncw said:dun forget... camera != canon & nikon only
there are still other players..though smaller...
:thumbsup: agree
rncw said:dun forget... camera != canon & nikon only
there are still other players..though smaller...
Yes, I agreed with Larry, lets leave it here.Larry said:i agree... i think it depends on which market segment that you're referring to. i heard/read somewhere that if you're talking about digicams in general (no price limit, as long as digital, etc), Sony is the market leader.
although in that sense i agree with scanner - there might not be actual numbers available but in terms of DLSR users, Canon definitely has the lead (for now). let's leave it at that, shall we? it's a moot issue anyway, since market share is a very mercurial and ever-changing issue.
![]()
scanner said:Well, nowsaday in Singapore do you see more Canon users than Nikon users? Does that answer your qns?
Jed said:Err. But that's Singapore. Land of the rich amateurs and wannabe pros and gadget freaks. And this is Clubsnap, land of the ex Hardwarezone forum. People with money to burn and high tech toys to buy, people who need something newer as soon as possible.
Not hardly surprising Canon's clearly the brand.
Jed said:Err. But that's Singapore. Land of the rich amateurs and wannabe pros and gadget freaks. And this is Clubsnap, land of the ex Hardwarezone forum. People with money to burn and high tech toys to buy, people who need something newer as soon as possible.
Not hardly surprising Canon's clearly the brand.
Ian said:The Ang Moh from Hell.
Jed said:Err. But that's Singapore. Land of the rich amateurs and wannabe pros and gadget freaks. And this is Clubsnap, land of the ex Hardwarezone forum. People with money to burn and high tech toys to buy, people who need something newer as soon as possible.
Not hardly surprising Canon's clearly the brand.
Cheesecake said:correction.
this isn't true. not all Singaporeans are 'rich amateurs and wannabe pros and gadget freaks'.
certainly not freaks.
kingpin said:Well put Ian.
Cheesecake said:correction.
this isn't true. not all Singaporeans are 'rich amateurs and wannabe pros and gadget freaks'.
certainly not freaks.
Jed said:Correction to the correction. As Ian has pointed out, I didn't say that "all Singaporeans" are like that. I specifically re-read my post after I wrote it to ensure I had not said that. Because I do know some, including a good number from this forum, who break out of this sad state of affairs.
Let me also stress that those comments are my personal opinion and have nothing to do with the Clubsnap administration. It has nothing to do with responsibility and abusing it, as I would still hold that belief whether I was a moderator or not. Perhaps it would be better if I re-registered my nick as something like Spongecake so I can post more freely?
And no, I have never at any stage said this is limited to just Singapore, Scanner. I can compare it to the UK and from that comparison, that comparison holds true. But all I said was that it applies to Singapore, I never did say it only applied to Singapore.
As Ian has pointed out, this is not so much a "notion" as a "demonstrable fact". I have just returned this evening from my local camera club meeting. I think the most expensive/high tech piece of gear any of them own, myself excepted, is a Nikon 5700. That's about 40 highly experienced photographers who create beautiful images on a consistent basis. Better than the majority of work I see coming from photographers on this and other local forums.
I wouldn't find it surprisingly if the members of Clubsnap have outbought the entire UK in terms of digital SLRs, if you exclude professionals from that count. And the UK has a very active photography community.
The local university here is ranked within the top 10 in the country (ok, top 20, it depends on who you ask). We get people from around the country, generally from the middle to upper class of society. Aside from the few students who do part time work (and I mean, serious part time work, circa S$3000 per month), none of them have DSLRs. Ian can vouch for the situation in Australia.
You might not like it, but if it's true, then you're going to have to acknowledge it. There's no need to get all defensive and start dropping emails/pms. The post wasn't targeted specifically at yourself, it was just a comment on the way photography is headed in Singapore.
Tell me which part of my original statement is inaccurate? Rather than spouting on about malicious and unsavoury comments.
If you take nothing else away from this thread, take this with you. I think the main problem is that Scanner and Cheesecake have got this idea about two points they thought I made that I never did.
First, that I said that ALL Singaporeans are like that. I never did.
Second, that Singapore is the ONLY area in the world that suffers from this malady. I never did.
Can I be an honorary Ang Moh from Hell? Pretty please...
Jed said:Can I be an honorary Ang Moh from Hell? Pretty please...
Jed said:The local university here is ranked within the top 10 in the country (ok, top 20, it depends on who you ask). We get people from around the country, generally from the middle to upper class of society. Aside from the few students who do part time work (and I mean, serious part time work, circa S$3000 per month), none of them have DSLRs. Ian can vouch for the situation in Australia.