jeryltan said:Interesting.. Then can nikon use canon flash? and still have ttl?
Canon flash doesn't offer automatic modes, so they'll always fire at full power (or less if u use the manual mode). This will be a bit harder to use.
jeryltan said:Interesting.. Then can nikon use canon flash? and still have ttl?
mpenza said:Can work but no TTL. U can use the automatic modes (found on most of the higher end Nikon flash) on the flash unit where a sensor will help determine the flash exposure and cut off the flash accordingly. What you need to do is to sync the aperture and ISO settings on the flash to be the same as the camera and to set the flash zoom accordingly.
I bought B+W UV 67mm for $70. TK photo.browndad said:what's the price of B+W UV for a 62mm?
Artosoft said:I bought B+W UV 67mm for $70. TK photo.
And B+W UV 58mm for $50 (if I am not wrong). Cathay Photo.
For 62mm you can agak-agak between $50-$70.
Regards,
Arto.
So if I am to use my lenses on both film and digital bodies, will it be a better choice to invest in UV filters?
Uhh i think CP i having a sales on b+w filters, just bght a 67mm 010 UV-Haze Filter for $49 its like even cheaper then MO and other shops? Try to take a look there bah, maybe im going back for another 52mm filter! Temptation!
B+W feels nicer.I don't really think that there is a significant optical difference between the well-known brands of filters except for flare-control and ease of cleaning which I think B+W is the best at (Not counting the really ex Leica and Heliopan filters).