ummm... really, you think?
http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/153888670/original.jpg[IMG]
1/100s f/4.0 at 85.0mm ISO 6400
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/154886876/original.jpg[IMG]
1/320s f/4.5 at 105.0mm ISO 11,400
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/153891433/original.jpg[IMG]
1/50s f/4.0 at 85.0mm ISO 12800
[IMG]http://www.pbase.com/pschia/image/153978872/original.jpg[IMG]
1/125s f/4.5 at 105.0mm ISO 12800
The very fact that the effective pixels of the sensor of the D750 and Df is 24Mp and 16Mp respectively meant that size of a pixel in the sensor of the Df is much larger than that of the D750 and everybody knows that the larger the size of the pixel, the better the high ISO capability of the sensor, right? Look at Sony... they deliberately reduced the effective pixels of the sensor in the Alpha 7S to 12 Mp just so as to boost the high ISO capability of that camera.[/QUOTE]
I am more interested in the cats than the noise performance here :gbounce:
so cute hehe