s1221ljc
Senior Member
It is more of a corporate culture thing...
Just look at Sigma: snapped out of it with the new CEO, and he really moved the company forward.
Precisely, spot on. And if there is no change/correction in thinking, such fiascos will be repeated in the future for sure...
IMHO there were a few decisions that did not go down well in the market:
- refusal to admit fault with D800 (left focus) and D600 (oil spots)repeated...
- quick minor change and D610 was born, making D600 virtually worthless in one swift move
- decision not to continue sub-pro lines (D700 + MB-D10 that rivals D3, D300/s + MB-D10 that also rivals D3 in some ways, e.g. fps, but in DX format) for fear/experience of sub-pro line cannibalizing the pro line. The fact that D700 and D300/s sold well reinforces the thought that more D3 would have been sold, which was non-sense (a bit like the software companies saying billions of lost sales due to piracy in China and India - sales that would not have existed anyway)
- over priced Nikon 1 series, Coolpix A
- oh yes the lack of DX lenses, especially in wide primes
I do not agree with the assertions that Df was done wrong, and overpriced, though, but that was another decision that the web writers looooveeeed to bash.
Nicely summarised, this is I believe what many Nikon users feel....
What I find most galling throughout the whole episode is that when users voice their disappointments & frustrations, they were beaten down, accused of & slammed for being disloyal/petty/ignorant, given crap excuses, threatened with legal suit for defamation etc. People hear but no one listened & corrective actions taken were superficial & more for show only. Goes to show that a few hundred person may feel intimidated & cowed, but a few million?
Last edited: