Yatlapball
Senior Member
Haha. Kosasih has a point :thumbsup:
But my vote still goes to the 17-35 ;p
But my vote still goes to the 17-35 ;p
Same here, AF-S 17-35 F2.8 also :thumbsup:Yatlapball said:Haha. Kosasih has a point :thumbsup:
But my vote still goes to the 17-35 ;p
Get the 17-35 always, no need to decide one :lovegrin:longkangman said:Let the buyer decide what he/she want lah.:lovegrin:
kosasih said:If you have the $$ to buy the FF body then you should have no issue to buy a FF lens![]()
david fun said:hello
anyone knows abt the performance of this lens
n the rough amt to get it in this market![]()
:thumbsup: or :thumbsd:
azul123 said:Where got FF body? Is it only the Kodak one?
KNIGHT ONG said:if you knows how to control it ... :thumbsup:
if you dont knows how to control it ... :thumbsd:
rebbot said::thumbsup: give that man a tiger! ;p
That's good if you have the Canon DSLR FF body. Seen and read the reviews on 5D not bad. But me stick with the system I have, too expensive and troublesome to switch.F5user said:I'm currently using my 17-35 on a 5d...(with an adapter of course)... something that can't be done with the G lenses...
(runs away.)
GmbH. said:i do know a few of my friends who use the Nikon 17-35 on their Canon system.
me inclusive.
it is really a fantastic lens.
the colours, contrast, sharpness is really different from the Nikon 17-55 DX
taker said:I forgot to mention, when using 17-35 on a Canon 5D with an adapter, you'll have
1. No auto focus &
2. No camera controlled aperature.
for everyday use, you are going to wish you had a compatible lens system.
My vote goes to 17-55DX. A killer lens! :thumbsup:
The lens will stay with you for a long time!