Contemplating on a future wide-angle purchase - would like to hear what the experienced have to say about the two.
Decided to opt out 14-24 due to the filter-less issue.
17-35 while much older lens, is slightly lighter and a guaranteed 2.8. I'm thinking of getting a good used one instead of brand new (which is about equal to a new 16-35).
Agreed that it seems I may have made up my mind on the 17-35mm already, but I maybe swayed if the decision is not a wise one.
Which route would you take if it was your choice and why? All thoughts and comments are appreciated.
I'll be using it on a cropped-frame D90, with possibility to upgrade to FF in distant or not too distant future...
(note: your vote will be revealed in the poll)
Decided to opt out 14-24 due to the filter-less issue.
17-35 while much older lens, is slightly lighter and a guaranteed 2.8. I'm thinking of getting a good used one instead of brand new (which is about equal to a new 16-35).
Agreed that it seems I may have made up my mind on the 17-35mm already, but I maybe swayed if the decision is not a wise one.
Which route would you take if it was your choice and why? All thoughts and comments are appreciated.
I'll be using it on a cropped-frame D90, with possibility to upgrade to FF in distant or not too distant future...
(note: your vote will be revealed in the poll)
Last edited: