The horizons are tilted, white balance totally off, maybe it will turn out better if you convert them to BnW, and i believe your noise level is too high. Digital blending and HDR may bring out more details.
i was playing with the white balance the whole nite, end up chosing the warmer balance, did not use Auto WB the whole nite. I do not understand why you mentioned noise level too high, I used ISO 100 throughout the whole nite but all the shots are pretty long exposure due to small aperture used.
which pic horizons are tilted?
Yes, HDR will bring out a nicer balance but no time to do that due to rush for time, maybe next time
The horizons are tilted, white balance totally off, maybe it will turn out better if you convert them to BnW, and i believe your noise level is too high. Digital blending and HDR may bring out more details.
In my eyes 1, 5, 6, 8 are tilted. some by just 3-5 degrees, and noise may be due to long exposure due to heated sensor especially no. 1(anyone can confirm this?)
i do check the verticality and i do not use the horizon cos of the angle of the shot the coast line may not be straight, so i always check on the building line instead, all except 6 which is slightly tilted but no as much as 3-5 degree as u stated, using Photoscape which is useful, when I frame the shot I normally use the guide lines in my camera against the straight edge of the building in the middle of the shot
In my eyes 1, 5, 6, 8 are tilted. some by just 3-5 degrees, and noise may be due to long exposure due to heated sensor especially no. 1(anyone can confirm this?)
In my eyes 1, 5, 6, 8 are tilted. some by just 3-5 degrees, and noise may be due to long exposure due to heated sensor especially no. 1(anyone can confirm this?)
becuase i was using the smallest aperture, i need much longer exposure time, will try to balance this next time, if i am not mistaken, i have set the noise reduction to the max
hmm... you shouldn't set the aperature too low... pictures will start to smoothen instead of the supposed more sharp and crisp pics because of diffraction... think don't set it below f/16, that should help reduce the need for long exposure time?
hmm... you shouldn't set the aperature too low... pictures will start to smoothen instead of the supposed more sharp and crisp pics because of diffraction... think don't set it below f/16, that should help reduce the need for long exposure time?