but it may not be very helpful to give the politically correct answer that both (or any other brands) are the same, and that should just buy either.
One camera system is incompatible with the other and for some people its a really major decision for their money.
I think alot of those comments are really honest answers and they are not said for the sake of being politically correct.
I guess what we are trying to advise is, camera brand does not define photography. Its like asking what brand of running shoes is better. Cant really get a definite answers, you will get some , but at the end of the day , we need to decipher facts and opinions.
I dont recall seeing any camera system that is compatible with each other also. So when we buy a camera, we are buying a system and we will grow in the hobby and we need to consider if that system supports our growth.
Currently, almost all of the major brands are able to support the average consumer photography growth demand.
I definitely agree that camera is not cheap and we need to invest our money wisely. Ironically, that isnt that case most of the time , as we notice that first time buyer perogative is still on finding the best camera , and not finding the most value for money camera.
Which is why , when alternatives are suggested, those choices are immediately rejected.
Maybe to put it another way, let say, which manufacturers makes the best car ? Continental or Japanese ? You will get tons of response. But in reality , a car is somehting that moves and brings you where you want to go . All cars can do that, but not all cars gives you the value that you need.
Thats consideration we are trying to get first time buyers into . nothing else really