Andrew Tay
New Member


Hi, can someone comment on the above link ?
rhema83 said:Hey Andrew, I think you really should read the books and learn the basic concepts of photography first. It will help you understand why your pictures turn out the way they are. Go read "Understanding Exposure", available from almost all the public libraries. I guarantee you will have many "ah" and "oh I see" moments.
If you don't understand the relationship between aperture, shutter speed and ISO; how the light meter works and how depth of field works, then you will have a hard time improving. It's like trying to drive a car without know what the steering wheel, accelerator pedal and brake pedal do.
So, next time I'll know what to do. Thanks.
Btw, the 3rd image, I took from my client $15million dollar penthouse. Not many people hv the chance. I shld hv do it correctly.
![]()
Hi, can someone comment on the above link ?
v0857 said:nice vantage point....a fresh view of this area.......thanks for sharing
v0857 said:Bro, save your pics in 1000 pixels size instead of 1024, otherwise it will look softer here, due to "force" downsize.
Hi, for night shooting, to get a sharp image, is it better to set long shutter (20sec), high aperture (F11) THAN short shutter (2sec), low aperture (F3.5) ???
Wow, this is too "qium" for me to understand. Can u elaborate more ??
v0857 said:When you resize your photo in your photo editor, choose 1000px. If there isn't this ready selection, there should be a "adjust longer length" or similar option, choose it and type 1000. Hope my explaination helps.
tecnica said:TS, from the looks of your pictures, the main problem is perhaps the lack of experience.
usually for landscapes, i will stop down to at least f8.0 to ensure i get enough depth into the pictures, max i will go is f13. most lenses are also at their sharpest when stopped down 2-3 stops from wide opened.
post processing also holds considerable importance as to how a picture will turn out. punching in some contrast and vibrance will remove most of the hazy look in your pictures.
for the record, my take on the similar scene, from my then 18-135: